[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Motion to intervene in Next Era wind farm case filed by landowners  

Credit:  By Hutch Post Staff | July 23, 2019 | www.hutchpost.com ~~

HUTCHINSON, Kan. – The lawsuit filed by Next Era Energy over the legality of the protest petitions associated with a proposed wind farm now has a challenge by more landowners.

These three landowners want to intervene, challenging the claims made by attorneys for Next Era.

Next Era Energy and Pretty Prairie Wind LLC., claims in their lawsuit that some of the petitions are not valid due to the method in which they were acquired and all of them should be dismissed.

The landowners within the area of the proposed wind farm managed to force a super vote of the Reno County Commission meaning all three had to be in favor of granting the permit.

The landowners involved with this motion to intervene have land adjoining the area proposed for the wind farm and are claiming an interest in the transaction and want Judge Tim Chambers to find their protest to the project recognized as valid under the due process clause. They believe they have an interest in what happens. They worry that if the protest petitions earlier deemed valid were to be made invalid, the two commissioners who voted in favor could then grant to conditional use permit.

If that were to happen, they say they would be able appeal the reasonableness and legality of that decision including the determination with respect to validity of that protest petitions. They would then be required to litigate that decision.

Of course they have to get the approval of Judge Chambers which could come in a hearing in this case. No dates have been set for any hearings on this matter.

Source:  By Hutch Post Staff | July 23, 2019 | www.hutchpost.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: