[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Award-winning sheep farmers sue AGL over wind farm construction  

Credit:  By Debbie Cuthbertson | The Age | June 30, 2019 | www.theage.com.au ~~

A farming couple whose sheep produced award-winning ultra-fine wool are suing energy giant AGL for $2.3 million for negligence, accusing it of destroying their business after more than half their flock died amid construction of a wind farm next door.

Andrew (Gus) Gardner, his wife, Ann, and their company, Marramok, are seeking $1.83 million in lost profits and $455,000 for lost use of profits.

In a statement of claim filed with the Supreme Court in January, the Gardners say 260 of their 400 ultra-fine-wool sheep died after construction on AGL’s adjoining Macarthur Wind Farm, near Hamilton in western Victoria, from late 2011 to mid-2012.

They allege dust emissions caused by construction of the wind farm were “noxious” and “caused a material injury to the sheep”.

In 2011 the Gardners, the sole shareholders in Marramok, won second prize in a competition run by luxury Italian menswear label Ermenegildo Zegna to find the finest and most valuable wool grown in Australia.

But they say they were inundated with dust and bombarded with noise from construction of the wind farm, including from rock crushers placed near their property, after which 260 of the sheep died and the remainder “became unable to produce ultra-fine wool”.

“The sheep were specially bred in that Ann and Gus had engaged in artificial selection of the sheep over many generations so as to produce ultra-fine wool of some of the highest quality … in the world,” their statement of claim reads.

The sheep were housed in a shed on the property, where the couple also have a home. They have been breeding the specialty sheep for more than 30 years.

“Between about 23 November 2011 and about May 2012, construction works at the site associated with the wind farm periodically caused significant quantities of dust to be emitted from the site and blow onto the land,” the statement of claim reads.

“Between about May and July 2012 … approximately 260 of Marramok’s sheep died … and the remaining sheep became unable to produce ultra-fine wool.

“Because of their special breeding, the sheep affected … could not be replaced by other sheep available on the market. Because of the adverse impacts, Marramok’s wool growing business was destroyed … and the value of shares held by Ann and Gus were diminished …

“AGL had a duty at common law … to take reasonable care to ensure that the dust emitted from construction works on the site did not injure the health of people or animals in the path of the dust.”

AGL knew the Gardners were operating a wool growing business on their property prior to it starting construction of the wind farm, the statement of claim says.

It was also aware of the Gardners’ concerns about dust emissions and the potential impacts on their sheep after they complained numerous times, the statement says.

The Gardners say the impact of construction was high when builders operated a rock crusher between December 13 and 20, 2011, and on March 27, 2012, and especially bad when it was used within 300 metres of their land between February 19 and March 3, 2012.

They were also affected by workers sifting dust in November 2011 and operating dump trucks on a turning pad in January 2012, their statement of claim says.

The statement documents dozens of complaints over consecutive months from the couple to AGL staff.

In response, “AGL apologised, promised that the dust would be abated and offered to pay for the Gardners’ home, furniture covers and bedding to be cleaned”.

“Once AGL received the complaints from the Gardners, AGL accepted a duty of care and admitted breach thereof, by apologising for the dust emissions, promising to mitigate them and offering to pay for cleaning,” the statement says.

However, AGL failed to abate dust emissions or tell builders to take sufficient steps to abate the dust, the Gardners say.

In its defence, filed by its lawyers in February, AGL admitted some allegations that dust had blown onto the Gardners’ land on occasion.

However, it denied a number of allegations, and said it had employed dust mitigation strategies, including reduced speed limits, use of water to suppress dust, use of dust monitors on the boundary of the Gardners’ property, and reducing use of machinery on windy days.

It made no admissions relating to any effect on the couple’s sheep.

“To the extent that any dust from the site permeated the shed at any stage, it does not know, and does not admit that any sheep were exposed to or ingested that dust,” the defence statement says.

“(I)f, which is denied, any dust emissions caused material injury to the sheep, that harm arose because of the abnormal sensitivity of the sheep kept by the plaintiffs.”

The 140-turbine wind farm generates enough energy to power about 173,000 homes.

AGL sold its 50 per cent stake for $532 million in September 2015 to investment firm HRL Morrison & Co.
However, it continues to maintain and operate the farm on behalf of HRL and Malakoff Corp, its other joint venture partner.

The case is expected to be heard in Warrnambool in late 2019.

Source:  By Debbie Cuthbertson | The Age | June 30, 2019 | www.theage.com.au

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: