[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Landowners want wind farm overseers fired  

Credit:  By Eric Meyer, Staff writer | Peabody Gazette-Bulletin | peabodykansas.com ~~

It wouldn’t be a county commission meeting without heated discussion of wind farms and roads.

Monday, the topics combined when Enel Green Power’s David Mueller presented letters from 26 of Enel’s Diamond Vista wind farm property owners asking the county to fire the firm overseeing Enel’s compliance with road reconstruction standards.

“They’re mad,” Mueller said. “They’re very, very upset.”

After lengthy discussion, the issue appeared be that some landowners thought they were being forced to use only designated roads to haul leftover rock, donated by Enel, to their private drives.

“Every step of the way,” Mueller said, “they’re being told they have to stay on the haul route,” a designated set of roads Enel must repair after its heavy equipment uses them.

However, one of two representatives of the oversight firm, Kirkham Michael, denied that it had forbidden farmers permission to use whatever roads they needed.

“So what’s the issue?” commission chairman Kent Becker asked.

Other questions appeared to focus on Kirkham Michael requiring Enel to grade two inches of uncompacted gravel atop roads, as specified by contract, even though grading would raise dust and uncompacted rock was being pulverized or washing away.

The letters also made reference to Kirkham Michael supposedly receiving directions from a lone county commissioner, although all three commissioners individually denied that.

“These are the same landowners who asked us to do away with Kirkham Michael when we first hired them,” commissioner Dianne Novak said.

“And maybe you should have listened,” Mueller responded.

He went on to say that Kirkham Michael no longer was needed now that the county has hired a county engineer.

Novak disagreed.

Nearly 45 minutes of discussion ensued with each side offering examples of problems supposedly created or resolved by Enel or Kirkham Michael.

In the end, all parties seemed to agree better communication was needed.

Source:  By Eric Meyer, Staff writer | Peabody Gazette-Bulletin | peabodykansas.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:

Tag: Complaints


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: