[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind power moratorium clears Senate  

Credit:  By Travis Fain, WRAL statehouse reporter | June 12, 2019 | www.wral.com ~~

Raleigh, N.C. – A three-year ban on new wind farms throughout much of eastern North Carolina cleared the Senate Wednesday on a divided vote.

Sponsors said, much as they did last week, that they hope to remove the moratorium language from the bill before it’s final. But Senate Bill 377 moved from the Senate to the House with the moratorium language intact and would ban windmills in wide swaths of the state to protect corridors military pilots use for training.

The bill has been pitched as a way to protect North Carolina’s military bases from potential closure or mission losses, and at least one commander has asked lawmakers to protect the “status quo” on the issue.

This issue has been Senate Majority Leader Harry Brown’s baby, but with Brown, R-Onslow, focused on state budget negotiations, Sen. Jim Perry, R-Lenoir, has been the Senate point man on the wind farm ban.

Perry said Wednesday that House and Senate negotiators and the wind industry are zeroing in on a compromise that will get rid of the moratorium, but he asked his colleagues in the Senate to approve the bill for now as is.

They did, 25-19, and the measure heads to the House for more debate.

Perry said after session that he expects the bill to come back to the Senate with a “more robust permitting process” for wind farms rather than the moratorium.

That process would let military commanders designate civilian representatives who participate in siting decisions, he said.

Moving the bill forward in the mean time is “not a beautiful thing,” Perry said, “but we all feel comfortable … with how it will end up.”

Source:  By Travis Fain, WRAL statehouse reporter | June 12, 2019 | www.wral.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: