[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Bill would prohibit new wind farms in coastal swath 

Credit:  Bill would allow new wind farms in NC, except in high-risk areas near military bases | By Matthew Burns, WRAL.com senior producer/politics editor | March 27, 2019 | www.wral.com ~~

Raleigh, N.C. – Almost two years after lawmakers put a halt to new wind farms in the state, Senate Majority Leader Harry Brown on Wednesday filed a bill to get wind energy blowing again in parts of North Carolina – but not in an area that most needs the development.

It was Brown, R-Onslow, who stuck the 18-month wind farm moratorium into a bill overhauling the state’s solar energy policies in the summer of 2017. He argued that giant turbines could interfere with training exercises near military bases across eastern North Carolina.

Military officials, who must sign off on all wind farm projects, said no projects pending at the time would have interfered with training.

During the moratorium, the state Department of Commerce and an engineering firm mapped the areas near military bases and training zones to identify where tall turbines would pose low, medium or high risks to training operations.

“The comprehensive mapping effort, if used as a template, should provide the state compatible growth around military installations that doesn’t interfere with ranges and military installation missions,” retired Maj. Gen. Robert Dickerson and retired Lt. Gen. Gary McKissock said in a joint statement. “This proposal brings clarity to an issue that may possibly weigh against North Carolina’s military installations in future [base closure] evaluations.”

Dickerson previously served as commander of Camp Lejeune, while McKissock was commander of Marine Corps Logistics Bases and Marine Corps Material Command.

Brown’s proposal would prohibit wind farms in high-risk areas on the map, which include a 100-mile swath along the coast between the Virginia state line and Camp Lejeune.

The new legislation “would remove many of the areas in North Carolina where wind has the opportunity for the greatest economic benefits. Many of the most economically distressed counties in eastern North Carolina also have some of the best wind resources,” said Adam Forrer of the Southeastern Wind Coalition.

“We shouldn’t take any action that jeopardizes the United States military’s ability to safely train the brave men and women who serve our country,” Brown said in a statement. “Beyond that, though, the military is the lifeblood of eastern North Carolina’s economy. It supports hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions of dollars in economic activity. Constructing obstacles that degrade the military’s ability to conduct training exercises puts our military bases at risk of closure.”

According to the North Carolina Military Business Center, the Department of Defense is the second-largest sector of the state’s economy, accounting for 12 percent of gross domestic product. The Department of Commerce reported in 2015 that the military supported 10 percent of North Carolina’s total employment.

The legislation isn’t trying to shut down one of the East Coast’s first wind farms, which is spread across Perquimans and Pasquotank counties, Brown said. The operation of more than 100 turbines, each standing more than 30 stories tall, is one of the largest taxpayers in the two impoverished counties.

Source:  Bill would allow new wind farms in NC, except in high-risk areas near military bases | By Matthew Burns, WRAL.com senior producer/politics editor | March 27, 2019 | www.wral.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky