[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Moray Council object to wind farm plans amid fears about effect on landscape  

Credit:  By David Walker | The Press and Journal | March 27, 2019 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Councillors have objected to plans for a large wind farm near Moray.

Force 9 Energy want to build the Clashgour wind farm, consisting of 48 turbines, about seven miles south of Forres.

Their plans have been lodged with the Scottish Government but yesterday, local councillors got to have their say and rejected the scheme – meaning a local public inquiry must now be held.

The turbines would almost completely encircle the existing Berry Burn site, although the turbines would be about 75% larger, standing between 425ft to 575ft.

In a report, Moray Council’s planning team said the project would cause “unacceptable” damage to the landscape by creating a wave of interconnected wind farms between Hill of Glaschyle, Berry Burn and Paul’s Hill which would be almost impossible to tell apart.

And at committee yesterday, councillors seized on those concerns and claimed they would be overlooked by the Scottish Government.

Councillor George Alexander said: “Advice has been given out consistently to the applicant that the turbines were against our policies and officers identified five different policies that were breached.

“Why is it that the applicant has chosen to ignore these policies, is it because they believe that even if we reject it, the Scottish Government will approve it?

“All this work we do is just brushed aside and a higher authority will decide so why have they ignored our concerns?”

Principal planning officer Neal McPherson suggested the policy was open to interpretation.

He said: “They take a different view and interpretation of our policy along with the national policy guidance and take a balanced view that the application would be accepted.”

Councillors were given the chance to object to the proposals fully or recommend a secondary option, for smaller turbines to be installed instead.

Elgin City North councillor Paula Coy put forward the second option as she does not believe the overall development would create a “wind farm landscape” and that they would not have an “accumulated impact” on the area.

However, that motion was defeated seven votes to three, meaning the council has officially objected to the scheme.

Andrew Smith, head of planning and development at Force 9 was “disappointed” but vowed to continue to work with the local community to seek a solution.

He said: “We are naturally disappointed by Moray Council’s decision to object to the Clash Gour Wind Farm proposal, especially given the level of support we have seen from community groups across Moray regarding the shared ownership opportunity associated with the proposals and also the estimated £26.7 million that would be added to the Moray economy from the project.”

“We fully believe that the proposal, which incorporates stakeholder feedback together with the significant environmental and technical survey work undertaken, strikes the right balance by minimising and mitigating environmental effects, whilst at the same time maximising the economic benefits and opportunities for Moray.

“We will continue to work with community groups across Moray to seek to realise the community shared ownership opportunity which unfortunately will now face a lengthy delay in coming forward, given the council’s objection to the wind farm and the public inquiry process that will now occur.’’

Source:  By David Walker | The Press and Journal | March 27, 2019 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: