[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County Board approves lower setback requirement for wind turbines 

Credit:  By Matt Olberding | Lincoln Journal Star | Mar 19, 2019 | journalstar.com ~~

Lancaster County will still have the most stringent setbacks for wind farms of any county in the state, but they will now be a little less stringent.

The County Board voted 4-1 Tuesday to approve an amendment offered by Commissioner Rick Vest that puts the setback at five times the wind turbine’s height to a nonparticipating property owner’s home or two times the height to the property line, whichever is longer.

For a 500-foot-tall wind turbine, that would be 2,500 feet, which is just less than half a mile.

That’s more than what was recommended by the Lincoln-Lancaster County Planning Department but quite a bit less than the mile setback the County Board approved last month after hearing testimony from members of the group Prairie Wind Watchers, who said the distance was necessary to protect their property values and quality of life.

NextEra Energy Resources has expressed interest in siting a wind farm on properties in southern Lancaster and northern Gage counties.

The Florida-based company succeeded last year in getting the county to increase sound limits for properties that choose to participate in a wind farm project to 50 decibels, but it did not challenge rules that require sound levels not to exceed 40 decibels during the day and 37 at night for nonparticipating properties.

Officials from NextEra, the Planning Department and Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department had all said during previous public testimony that the sound limits would make it difficult to locate wind turbines within a mile of a nonparticipating property.

Prairie Wind Watchers had used those admissions to craft the mile setback proposal.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Yvonne Mihulka-Poole, who lives in the area, said the mile setback along with the sound levels are needed to protect property owners who unlike their neighbors are not being paid to be part of a wind farm development.

“The distance and the sound together will protect us,” she said.

Vest, who was one of three commissioners to vote in favor of the mile setback requirement last month, said his goal was to allow wind development while providing as much protection as possible to neighbors who don’t want to be part of a project.

He said that after last month’s meeting, he heard new information that suggested the mile setback might stifle wind development in the county, something he said was never his intent.

David Kuhn of NextEra said the sound-modeling study the company did that suggested turbines would have to be a mile from homes was based on “the most conservative case possible” and assumed that the largest and loudest turbines would be used.

New technology or use of smaller turbines could mean the company could site them closer than a mile to a home and still meet sound requirements.

Unlike previous hearings, when wind opponents far outnumbered proponents, there were about twice as many people who testified Tuesday against the mile setback as those who testified in favor of keeping it.

While many were representatives of clean energy or other advocacy groups, several area farmers who are hoping to host wind turbines showed up to testify.

Greg Schwaninger said there are 100 area landowners who have signed leases with NextEra, which shows there are plenty of people who do want to be part of the project.

And others pointed out that the project will provide a needed source of income to farmers who are struggling with low commodity prices and high property taxes.

“Lancaster County is in need of this wind farm for clean energy, for the tax dollars and just really to help out Lancaster County,” said Carla Hansmeyer.

In addition to Vest, Commissioners Roma Amundson, Jennifer Brinkman and Sean Flowerday voted for the amended setbacks, while Deb Schorr voted against.

Other than Vest, Amundson was the only commissioner to change her vote. She said she lives on an acreage and certainly sees the quality-of-life argument. But she said she’s also a farmer’s daughter and can see the argument for wind farms as a form of property tax relief.

Source:  By Matt Olberding | Lincoln Journal Star | Mar 19, 2019 | journalstar.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky