[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Lighthouse Wind: When does no mean no?  

Credit:  By James C. Hoffman | Lockport Union-Sun & Journal | www.lockportjournal.com ~~

Many of us from the townships of Somerset and Yates were heartened by the news that Apex “Clean Energy” had withdrawn its application to construct a 108 MW 30 turbine Industrial Wind Turbine complex on Galloo Island, at the Eastern end of Lake Ontario.

Public concern and involvement did stop an ill cited major Industrial Wind Turbine project. The Galloo Project has fluctuated through several variations over the last 12 years. The withdrawal has come unfortunately, with the caveat that Apex is “open to initiating the project (again) when the time is right.” When does no really mean no!

When does the bullying and harassment of a small rural community by huge billion-dollar companies stop!

Light House Wind like Galloo, is the wrong project in the wrong place. More than five years have passed since Apex “Clean Energy” solicited its first secretive 49-year leases in the Town of Somerset. The citizens of Somerset and Yates have in that time period, educated themselves about the alleged benefits and potential hazards and negatives of an Industrial Wind Turbine Project. It has been overwhelmingly concluded after three independent surveys, countless public meetings, public hearings and an Apex Forum, that the risks to residents are far too great and the benefits to residents are nil. There are better ways to “save the planet and protect our children and grand-children” than cluttering up the landscape with huge grotesque structures that threaten the health, welfare and life style of residents. Mothers Up Front should make note of the following:

The Nature Conservancy, a widely respected environmental organization, has concluded that “conserving and restoring forests, grasslands and wetlands can deliver up to 37 percent of the emissions reductions needed to curb the climate change predicted by 2030.” We are blessed with those features in our area. Preserving and enhancing the growth and preservation of forests, grasslands and wetlands has been public policy for years dating in Somerset, back to the original Comprehensive Plan of 1972.

Local ordinances of both towns have codified this policy. We in Somerset and Yates are well aligned with those who desire a “cleaner, healthier Earth.” The proposed Light House Wind project is in direct conflict with this and is in violation of Town Law. Ignoring this, Apex “Clean Energy” continues to Bully our community in the hope that The Article 10 Siting Board will disregard long standing policy and current law and approve The Light House Wind Project.

Tragically, organizations that could support this open space policy have recently bought in to supporting the Lighthouse Wind Project. Specifically, the Sierra Club and the Adirondack Mountain Club have endorsed Lighthouse Wind. These organizations have strayed far from their original roots and have lost their way and damaged their creditability. Perhaps it is because the vast majority of the membership will never live among Industrial Wind Turbines and is therefore content to clutter someone else’s backyard. The NIMBY movement is alive and well among the supporters of Light House Wind.

It is time for Apex “Clean Energy” to reassess the risks and rewards associated with the development of Light House Wind as they have done for the Galloo Island project and terminate all effort.

James C. Hoffman is a resident of Somerset.

Source:  By James C. Hoffman | Lockport Union-Sun & Journal | www.lockportjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: