[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Willard schools neutral on wind turbines  

Credit:  Zoe Greszler | Norwalk Reflector | norwalkreflector.com ~~

WILLARD – After much research, debate and hearing heated discussions from the community, the Willard City School board voted to remain neutral regarding wind turbines coming to the area.

During the February board meeting the decision passed with a 3-2 vote in favor of the board not having an opinion – either for or against – on the wind turbines and the monetary benefits the school could receive should they be erected.

Board members Rod Cok and Rick Willoughby voted against the neutrality.

No further discussion took place during the meeting.

District superintendent Jeff Ritz declined to comment on what he felt would be best for the schools.

During a presentation at January’s board meeting, APEX leader Sarah Moser was invited to discuss some facts about the project with the board. Initially the board had planned to make a decision during that meeting – indicating if it though the wind farm project would benefit the district. However, after hearing from the community, it was invited to receive “unbiased education” on the issue at a pro-wind vs. anti-wind” public debate on Feb 19 Tiffin University. The debate, however, was canceled.

Moser told the board there’s “a lot of fear mongering out there” attempting to sway the Willard school board’s vote on a decision involving what one opposer called “monster turbines” coming to the area.

Numerous community members also showed up to that meeting and spoke during the public participation section, asking the board to remain neutral on the matter.

“I’m asking that you remain neutral,” one Willard man said. “Bellevue officially removed their support (of the wind turbine project). They will remain neutral. Seneca (East Local Schools) has intervened. Monroeville remains neutral. Your focus should be on the school and the students, not to endorse political issues one way or another.”

Many people echoed that statement, including one woman who asked the board to consider how their endorsement or lack thereof could affect the local voters. She said some make voting decisions based on what “community leaders” say are best instead of doing the research themselves. The woman said this places an extra weight of responsibility on the board to refrain from getting involved in what she called political affairs.

“Why would the school support something that affects the entire district?” she said. “Staying neutral would be best so people can vote how they want, so they can decide what’s best for themselves.”

Other complaints cited the board’s lack of consideration for the environmental and aesthetic effects the turbines could have on the surrounding areas.

“It’s not a political issue, but it’s become one,” the APEX representative said. “I don’t know when renewable energy became a political issue, but it’s being portrayed as one now. … If it’s best best for your community to stay neutral, stay neutral. There’s a lot of fear mongering out there. You need to do what’s best for your community.”

Board member Marsha Danhoff said the board wasn’t viewing their decision as a political one, but simply indicating if the district would benefit from the project.

No further discussion on the issue is anticipated at future meetings.

Source:  Zoe Greszler | Norwalk Reflector | norwalkreflector.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.