[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind power just doesn’t add up  

Credit:  The Advertiser-Tribune | Feb 19, 2019 | www.advertiser-tribune.com ~~

There has been a lot of rhetoric coming out of Washington, D.C., and California lately about transforming our electrical power sources to 100-percent renewable energy. We also have heard local comments about replacing the output of Davis-Besse nuclear power plant with wind energy. Both comments are totally unrealistic.

Davis-Besse has a rated capacity of 894 megawatts. Per the Energy Services Group International, nuclear power is on average 91-percent efficient while natural gas is 50-percent, coal is 59-percent and wind power is 32-percent.

So how many wind turbines would it take to replace Davis-Besse’s net capacity of 813MW? If we use General Electric 2.8-127 turbines, which is the turbine model that Seneca Wind plans to use, we would need 936 turbines. This is the equivalent of 4.4 times the number of turbines being proposed for the Republic Wind, Seneca Wind and Emerson Creek project combined! This number of turbines would spread over 600,000 acres, which is 1.7 times the size of Seneca County. Northwest Ohio would look like a turbine forest.

Furthermore, fossil-fuel power generators still would be needed as backup generators for when the wind doesn’t blow or during peak demand periods. Consumers want the lights to come on when they flip the switch and, if we rely on 100-percent wind power, we won’t have that guarantee.

Ohio is part of the PJM power grid that extends from New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, eastern Kentucky and the Chicago area. The power supplied to this grid at 6 a.m. Feb. 15 was 95,000 MW. Wind power contributed 6.6 percent of the power, while coal, gas and nuclear combined to produce 86,000 MW, which equals 90 percent of the total. It would take nearly 100,000 turbines to replace the power generated by fossil fuels on this specific day, but backup power still would be needed. How many turbines would be needed for the entire country?

Given the sheer lack of capacity of wind turbines and their inherent inefficiency, it isn’t practical to consider them as a viable power source to displace nuclear,- gas- or coal-powered sources. So when you hear the rhetoric of green energy, renewable energy and converting to 100-percent renewables, remember that the physics and the math just don’t add up.

At the end of the day, the discussion ends up being all about politics and money at the expense of the taxpayer and the rural residents who are forced to sacrifice their quality of life.

Greg Smith,

Bloomville

Source:  The Advertiser-Tribune | Feb 19, 2019 | www.advertiser-tribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: