[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

More visual information demanded for determination of Caithness turbine appeal  

Credit:  By Susy Macaulay | The Press and Journal | February 7, 2019 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Determination of an application to build 300ft wind turbine in Caithness has been deferred by Highland councillors for more visual information.

Whirlwind Renewables has applied to place the turbine on rough grazing land immediately southeast of the Forss Business and Technology Park and the existing six-turbine Forss Wind Farm.

Planners refused the application on the grounds that it was a different height from the Forss windfarm turbines and therefore would appear ‘incongruous’ and ‘visually confusing’, particularly when viewed from the east.

They also said the turbine would result in a ‘significantly detrimental impact’ to a house 300 yards away, and the settlement of Crosskirk, less than a mile away.

Whirlwind Renewables appealed the decision and the application came before the Planning Review Body for determination this week.

Councillors said as noise or shadow flicker were not cited as grounds for appeal, visual impact was the key issue.

They said the photography accompanying the plans did not show clearly enough the visual impact suggested and asked for the case to be deferred to allow the applicant to supply more detailed imagery.

Planning Review chairman Allan Henderson agreed to the deferral, to allow time for the applicant to provide a montage of images from edge of the nearest building at 3 Lybster Road to determine if the turbine would have an ‘overwhelming unpleasant effect’.

Source:  By Susy Macaulay | The Press and Journal | February 7, 2019 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: