[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

County opposing wind energy bill 

Credit:  Scott Koperski, Daily Sun news editor | Jan 30, 2019 | beatricedailysun.com ~~

The Gage County Board of Supervisors is opposing a bill that officials say would hinder wind energy in the state.

Introduced by Sen. Tom Brewer of District 43, LB373 would deal with setback and other regulations for wind turbines.

Lisa Wiegand with Gage County Planning and Zoning said during Wednesday’s regular County Board meeting that the proposal was designed with Cherry County, which Brewer represents, in mind. Applying the proposal to areas like Gage County would be detrimental in three ways, she said.

• The bill requires a three-mile setback from turbines to residences.

• There’s no variable allowed for turbine height.

• The bill strikes the opportunity to take a wind energy issue before a variance committee.

Wiegand said three-mile setbacks would cripple wind energy in Gage County, due to the larger rural population.

“If you look at Gage County and you look at the three mile demographics that’s being proposed, that pretty well places a moratorium on any development,” she said. “Not saying those are for or against, but it’s a moratorium against because of our density and land use is so different.

“When we developed our wind regulations our goal was to create a balance between those people who choose to participate and not participate.”

Gage County’s current setback requirement is 1/3 mile for nonparticipating residences and no setback for participating landowners, which are people who own the land or have contracts for turbine use.

County Board member Matt Bauman questioned why the state would get involved in wind regulations rather than allowing counties to reach their own regulations.

“This is a local issue, why are they trying to make it statewide?” he asked. “This should be a countywide issue… If Cherry (County) wants every three miles, that’s on them. I don’t know why they would try and impose something for the entire state. It’s a local issue.”

The board ultimately voted 6-1 to submit a letter of opposition to the legislature, with Gary Lytle casting the lone vote in opposition. He cited numerous public hearings where residents expressed concern about health issues related to wind turbines as his reason for not wanting to publicly oppose the bill.

“I’m just not comfortable,” he said. “We’ve heard enough conversation in the last year from opponents of wind energy being outside their back door as far as health issues and that. I don’t want to be on the record with this letter.”

Despite hearings at county meetings regarding wind regulations, board member Dennis Byars said it was the county’s responsibility to submit the letter and let senators know its position.

“The problem is when you’re sitting in a committee in the legislature and you don’t hear opposition then you start to feel that people are in support of the bill that we have introduced,” he said. “The committee wants to hear if we’ve got problems and don’t think it’s a good idea. If we just ignore it, then we just give up.”

State senators will discuss the bill during a Thursday hearing.

Source:  Scott Koperski, Daily Sun news editor | Jan 30, 2019 | beatricedailysun.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky