[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Senator Bolin gives lone “Nay” to state-land wind farm lease bill 

Credit:  Del Bartels, Capitol Bureau | The Capital Journal | Jan 25, 2019 | www.capjournal.com ~~

Even after a relatively easy sail, bills can still have opponents.

House Bill 1031 was first read in the House, Jan. 8. The House Commerce and Energy Committee passed it forward, Jan. 14, with the full House passing it further the next day. The Senate Commerce and Energy Committee made minor amendments, then also passed it. On Jan. 24, the full Senate voted to send it to the Governor’s desk.

The last vote was all “Yea,” except for one “Nay.”

That no vote came from Senator Jim Bolin (R-Canton).

“Wind power is a sensitive subject in southern Lincoln County,” Bolin said. “The subject has many concerns. About two years ago, there were efforts to bring wind towers to my district. Many objected. The county commissioners set very strong setbacks, and the industry wanted smaller setbacks for the towers. Votes were taken, and the commissioners maintained these setbacks. I am not against wind energy, but it is a very intense, localized issue in my district.”

The bill is a clarification of various other laws, many found in different locations of the state’s codified law. It was summarized by Ryan Brunner, Commissioner of the Office of School and Public Lands. The office does currently issue wind/solar leases or easements, “but it is a complicated web of agreements because different components of a wind agreement occur in different areas of state law with different rules,” Brunner said. “For example, right now the statutes to get a wind easement are in one section of law, but to build the transmission line across school land is in a different section with different rules. To build a road to the wind turbine is in another section and to build the common carrier transmission lines that go to an end user are in yet another area.”

Source:  Del Bartels, Capitol Bureau | The Capital Journal | Jan 25, 2019 | www.capjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky