[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Go to multi-category search »

LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Campaigners hit back at Kirkby Wind Farm petition  

Credit:  By Tom Murphy | The Mail | www.nwemail.co.uk ~~

Campaigners who want to see the Kirkby Moor wind farm pulled down say a petition with more than 100,000 signatures from people across the world is not as relevant as views from local people.

The 12 turbines, built in 1993, will be the subject of a public inquiry later this month after South Lakeland District Council denied Ventient Energy permission to extend the lifespan of the wind farm until 2027.

An online petition to keep the turbines and has attracted more than 120,000 signatures.

But a spokesman for Kirkby Moor Protectors (KMP) said: “Given the nature of their on-line petition the Green Party and Ventient Energy must be very disappointed that only 120,000 responded.

“It was basically asking for a commitment to renewables and drew responses from all over the country and abroad.

“Given the fact that this is a local planning inquiry with many local issues, we don’t think the views of people who are not local are relevant.

“Nowadays plans for windfarms must have the backing of the local community with each case taken on its individual merits.

“What really counts is what the local parishes, the local councillors, our local MP, Cumbria Tourism, Cumbria Wildlife, and a host of local agencies and organisations think.”

Ventient Energy argues continued use of the turbines would be beneficial to the community and the country’s green energy sector.

A public inquiry will be held at the Coronation Hall in Ulverston on January 22 to decide the wind farm’s fate.

Source:  By Tom Murphy | The Mail | www.nwemail.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments to query/wind-watch.org.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: