[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Another take on solar, wind power 

Credit:  Courier & Press | Dec. 31, 2018 | www.courierpress.com ~~

I would like to add to the ideas that Jean Webb proposed in her recent Letter to the Editor “Let’s All Become YIMBYs (Yes In My Back Yard).”

Please, do not let us neglect the thousands of unused acres in our state and national parks! Most could readily accommodate solar and wind projects! Solar panels could be used for marking trails, and wind turbines could be placed in most open areas, many with reliable winds – several hundred turbines could easily be placed atop Yosemite’s iconic Half Dome! The 106 acres of national parkland surrounding the Washington Monument would be perfect for solar panel placement; pedestrian walkways could be easily integrated among the panels.

And do not let us forget our nation’s cemeteries! There, solar panels would clearly be a win-win proposition, as fossil fuels would not have to be expended to mow the grass and loved ones could visit graves in the shade, provided by solar panels. (No trees required!)

In fact, why not surround all residential developments with industrial-size solar fields, with the houses neatly integrated among the panels. (Who really needs open space, after all!)

You don’t agree?

My neighbors and I disagree. Although solar and wind power are of great benefit, not every placement makes sense. Ms. Webb is correct that there should be fewer barriers to individuals wishing to install home solar.

The benefits of the power source to the nation as a whole are not the only consideration however. Some thought must be given to the effect on citizens who live in the area of the proposed placement and on property values and aesthetics of the area—both at the present time and 25 years into the future, when the solar panels will have reached the end of their useful life and will need to be removed and destroyed. What then?

– Eric Cure

Source:  Courier & Press | Dec. 31, 2018 | www.courierpress.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon