[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

‘We’ve already done our bit’ – Fears over impact of hundreds more offshore turbines  

Credit:  Andrew Hirst | Ipswich Star | 01 December 2018 | www.ipswichstar.co.uk ~~

Hundreds more wind turbines could be built off the Suffolk coast after the region’s seabed was included in a new round of bidding for developers.

The Crown Estate announcement has proved divisive, with business leaders welcoming the economic opportunities, while campaigners warn of the environmental impact of onshore infrastructure.

Currently, there are two wind farms off Suffolk’s coast, Galloper and Greater Gabbard, featuring 196 turbines. ScottishPower Renewables (SPR) is building the 102-turbine East Anglia ONE and has plans for three more.

While the schemes are expected to power millions of homes, they have also seen miles of cabling laid underground and a 30-acre substation proposed for the Suffolk Coast and Heaths AONB.

Campaigners warned Suffolk was being swamped by electrical infrastructure – and now say their fears have been confirmed.

Peter Chadwick, whose Save Our Sandlings group opposes SPR’s substation, said he was “very alarmed”. “The fragile coastal area around Leiston has already done its bit for the nation’s power needs and cannot take any more industrial development,” he added.

SOS’s Paul Chandler called for co-ordination to “minimise the horrendous impact”.

Suffolk Preservation Society director Fiona Cairns welcomed green energy but raised concerns about “large scale, industrial installations” onshore. She called for energy to be transferred to the National Grid via an offshore facility instead. “This is essential if Suffolk, as the nation’s energy gateway, is not to be permanently harmed by the piecemeal delivery of wind energy,” she added.

Andrew Stringer, leader of the Liberal Democrat, Green and Independent Group at Suffolk County Council, said renewable energy was to be welcomed “but not at any cost”. He said most energy generated in Suffolk was transferred out of the region, which posed “concerning infrastructure issues, no matter what technology is used”.

Together Against Sizewell C’s Joan Girling, said there had been a lack for planning over power production. “We know wind farms are more environmentally friendly, but we also think the Government should consider the landfall and infrastructure.”

Crown Estate said regions had been selected because they were technically feasible,had available seabed and few constraints.

New job opportunities

The Crown Estate’s announcement is hoped to lead to new jobs and business opportunities in the region.

New Anglia LEP’s chief executive Chris Starkie said it reinforces the region’s position as “an international centre for the offshore wind industry” bringing thousands of well paid jobs.

He accepted, however, that more work was required to examine the associated onshore infrastructure.

With the Port of Harwich having played a major role in the Galloper wind farm, Essex businesses also hope to benefit.

Tim Young, who is responsible for business at Colchester Borough Council, said: “The energy industry is a key sector for north Essex, providing excellent economic growth potential, jobs and opportunities for companies across the region.

“The Crown Estate’s recent announcement paves the way for even more growth in this industry, as well as providing a huge boost for the production of clean and sustainable energy at a time when we need to be doing all we can to tackle global warming.”

Source:  Andrew Hirst | Ipswich Star | 01 December 2018 | www.ipswichstar.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: