LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

DeKalb County Board approves ordinance for wind energy development 

Credit:  By Katie Finlon | Daily Chronicle | www.daily-chronicle.com ~~

SYCAMORE – After at least nine months of discussion and deliberation, the DeKalb County Board finally passed a final wind ordinance during its meeting Wednesday at the DeKalb County Farm Bureau.

The board voted, 19-3, in favor of the ordinance, which included two amendments by County Board member Maureen Little to bring back the wind ordinance sections that originally mandated zero shadow flicker and stricter noise regulations. Two board members were absent.

The vote comes after several board members, including DeKalb County Board Chairman Mark Pietrowski Jr., expressed disappointment in board member Dan Cribben for bringing forward several amendments that would make adjustments to some of the most contentious parts of the wind ordinance, including shorter setbacks.

“Now is not the time, at the 11th hour, to change everything,” Pietrowski said.

Cribben submitted 13 additional proposed amendments ahead of the Wednesday meeting. Those amendments included eliminating tower height restrictions, adjusting setback distances by tower height, determining which setbacks could be subjected to a waiver and changing enforcement regulations – none of which made it into the final ordinance.

“Quite simply, the county does not require this level of enforcement for any other applicant for any other special use permit,” Cribben said.

Little, a Republican who represents District 2 that includes Kingston and Genoa, said she probably has heard from more people than other board members regarding the ordinance. She said she fully supported the original wind ordinance draft and did not support Cribben’s amendments.

“You cannot work on this diligently and, at the last moment, flip this,” Little said.

Pietrowski previously had said the goal was to have the vote happen before the new County Board starts meeting regularly after the Nov. 6 election. A new board will be seated during a Dec. 3 County Board meeting.

The county’s Planning and Zoning Committee also unanimously voted last month to advance the ordinance to the County Board with the recommendation of approval submitted by county hearing officer Dale Clark. Board members had said the hearing officer’s recommendations were vague at best, but agreed the best decision is to move the ordinance forward after more than a year of discussion.

Board member Tracy Jones said the ordinance that ended up being passed during the County Board meeting Wednesday basically was the original version that the Planning and Zoning Committee approved before the hearing officer added his recommendations last month.

Jones said he disagreed with all of Cribben’s proposed amendments that made it to a vote. Despite not seeing eye-to-eye with Cribben, he said, he thought those amendments provided excellent discussion that needed to happen during the Wednesday meeting ahead of the final vote.

“I think that’s what good government does,” Jones said.

The final vote comes after the moratorium that the county set on wind energy projects in 2017 was extended to the end of this year by the County Board during a September meeting. It originally was supposed to expire last month if the county didn’t pass a wind ordinance, but was extended to the end of the year or until the county passed a final ordinance.

Wind developers now will be able to submit proposals for special use permits.

Source:  By Katie Finlon | Daily Chronicle | www.daily-chronicle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky