LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME


[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]

Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Fairbank wind farm dealt legal blow 

Credit:  Tim Jamison | The Courier | wcfcourier.com ~~

WATERLOO – Owners of wind energy turbines east of Fairbank have lost another round in their battle to keep the structures up.

A three-judge panel of the Iowa Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected an appeal filed by attorneys for Mason Wind, Dante Wind 6, Galileo Wind 1 and Venus Wind 4, which are under a Fayette County District Court order to remove three turbines by Dec. 9.

Justices Brent Appel, Thomas Waterman and Edward Mansfield confirmed a July 11 decision by Justice David Wiggins to let the district court’s decision stand.

The ruling is another legal victory for the city of Fairbank and a private developer who independently sued in 2015 to block the construction of the turbines, which they deemed detrimental to the community’s growth.

The wind companies erected the wind farm before District Court Judge John Bauercamper ruled they were installed in violation of county zoning regulations. That decision touched of a series of appeals.

All three turbines are being dismantled this month to comply with Bauercamper’s order.

But attorneys for the wind companies are continuing legal action both in the district and appellate courts, which would allow them to put the turbines back up.

Notably, the companies attempted to apply for a zoning variance last year to legalize the existing turbines. That request was rejected by the county Board of Adjustment, prompting the turbine owners to seek a district court review.

Source:  Tim Jamison | The Courier | wcfcourier.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky