Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
CAQ government looking to abandon $600M wind farm on Quebec’s North Shore
Credit: 'This project isn't profitable,' says minister of energy and natural resources | CBC News | Posted: Oct 30, 2018 | www.cbc.ca ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The Quebec government wants out of the contentious Apuiat wind farm project and has tapped Hydro-Québec to come up with an exit strategy, Radio-Canada has learned.
The Apuiat project, first proposed in 2015, is to produce an estimated 200 megawatts annually from about 50 wind turbines on Quebec’s North Shore, near the town of Port-Cartier.
Backed by the former Liberal government, the $600-million project was highly criticized by the CAQ’s François Legault during the election campaign.
“We’re not going to oblige Hydro-Québec to produce electricity we do not need,” Legault said Sept. 13, during the first televised debate on Radio-Canada.
The minister of energy and natural resources, Jonatan Julien, said the CAQ government’s position hasn’t changed.
“In a context where we have an energy surplus, this project isn’t profitable,” said Julien Tuesday.
Innu consortium demands meeting
The wind farm is being developed by Boralex, a private renewable energy firm, in partnership with nine Innu communities on the North Shore and in the Lac-Saint-Jean region. Under the proposal, Hydro-Québec would buy electricity from the consortium.
Hydro-Québec concluded a draft contract with promoters in August but agreed to wait until after the Oct. 1 election to finalize the deal.
The government will now “take the time to meet with the involved parties and First Nations before making our decision final, ” said Julien.
Société Apuiat, which represents the Innu stakeholders, and Boralex released a joint statement Tuesday, saying they were “disappointed to learn of the government’s intention regarding our project” without having had a chance to present it to the new government.
The fact that that the government is now expressing its lack of support for the project without having spoken to the Innu promoters yet is unacceptable, said the Chief of the Assembly of First Nations Quebec-Labrador, Ghislain Picard.
“The Innu Nation is the promoter of the project – for me, it’s important that the promoter isn’t left out of such an important decision,” he said.
Some 300 to 400 jobs would be created during the construction phase of the project, with 10 to 15 permanent jobs staying in the region to maintain the operation over the next 25 years, according to the promoters.
For Alain Thibault, the mayor of Port-Cartier, where many of those jobs would land, the CAQ’s haste to pull the plug on the project comes as a surprise, after what he thought was a promising meeting with Julien last week.
“He really seemed interested in the project. He was asking a lot of questions on why we needed this in Port-Cartier,” said Thibault.
He said if Apuiat is dropped, the CAQ will have a hard time promoting any new ventures in the region.
“Every time he will want to break ground in Nitassinan [the Innu territory], he will have to sit down with them.”
“The Innu are no longer in a mindset of just receiving annuity from the government,” said Société Apuiat in its statement. “On the contrary, Innu want to implement their own investment projects, to build something that is sustainable and renewable, to develop expertise and pride.”
One of the premier’s main arguments against the project during the election campaign was the Hydro-Québec president and CEO Éric Martel’s lack of support for the wind farm, made public in a letter last August.
The Apuiat project would cost the Crown corporation $1.5 to $2 billion over 25 years, Martel said in that letter.
Boralex and Société Apuiat challenge that analysis in their statement, claiming that by the time the wind farm would be up and running in 2022, “the margin of manoeuvre Quebec has in its energy supply will be running out.”
– with files from Radio-Canada’s Sébastien Bovet
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: