LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Windfarm plan rejected at scenic site 

Credit:  Cumnock Chronicle | www.cumnockchronicle.com ~~

A windfarm plan for one of the “most scenic” landscapes in East Ayrshire has been turned down.

Developers wanted to erect seven turbines only 1.3km from New Cumnock on a sheep farm.

Innogy Renewables offered the New Cumnock community the chance to invest 15 per cent in the venture at a cost of £3.8 million.

Councillors rejected the 135m tall turbine bid at the East Ayrshire planning committee Friday (September 28) after officers recommended its refusal.

A council report said the plan would bring wind farm development closer to “more settled, sensitive landscapes.”

It described Glen Afton as one of the most “scenic and sensitive in East Ayrshire.”

It stated the Ashmark Hill proposal would cause “significant adverse landscape and visual impacts.”

Innogy offered the New Cumnock Development Trust shared ownership of the wind farm at 15 per cent. The community company had not accepted so far but had vouched support for the renewable proposal.

Councillor John McFadzean questioned whether the trust would be able to raise £3.8 million.

The Conservative councillor said: “We don’t want to stand in the way of progress.”

New Cumnock Community Council also supported the development stating the “scale of the proposal is appropriate in the context of the surrounding area.”

It is the second attempt to build a wind farm on the site by the same developer, which was previously called RWE Innogy UK. The earlier bid, also thrown out, was similar with seven turbines but they only reached 116m high.

Councillors undertook a site visit to consider the matter on Tuesday.

Karen Fox, Innogy head of development strategy, said: “We are very surprised and disappointed with today’s decision. It does not reflect the support for the project. No objections were raised by any statutory consultees and only two by members of the public.”

The company is considering whether to appeal.

Source:  Cumnock Chronicle | www.cumnockchronicle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

Tag: Victories


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky