[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Grain Belt opponents have more setbacks  

Credit:  By Forrest Gossett | Gatehouse Media Group | Aug 21, 2018 | www.hannibal.net ~~

Opponents of Grain Belt Express experienced a set of legal setbacks on Tuesday.

First, the Missouri Supreme Court refused to reconsider a July 17 decision overturning the Missouri Public Service Commission’s rejection of the Grain Belt project for Missouri, sending the case back to the commission to be reconsidered. Grain Belt wants to build electric lines to transmit solar-generated power from western Kansas across Missouri and three other states to reach East Coast utilities.

Meanwhile, judges of the Western District of the Missouri Court of Appeals upheld a lower court ruling in Callaway County that dismissed a lawsuit from the Missouri Landowners Alliance challenging the legality of a July 30, 2012, decision by the Monroe County Commission that gave the Grain Express permission to cross county rights-of-way. The Landowners Alliance had sued Grain Belt and the Monroe County Commissioners individually, alleging that commissioners violated the Missouri Law when they approved the applications, because the issue was not on the commission agenda when it was passed.

No one in the case disputes that the Monroe County Commission violated the Sunshine Law. The July 30 vote was taken, though the issue was not on its formal agenda, which by law had to be published at least 24 hours in advance.

County commissioners subsequently approved the minutes of that meeting and purchased a legal notice ad that ran in the Monroe County Appeal on Aug. 9. By the time the landowners noticed the violation more than a year later, it was too late for action, ruled the courts, as both the Callaway County court and appeals court said the landowners group filed its case after the statute of limitations had expired, meaning there was no legal remedy available to the landowners.

“Because the Sunshine Law violations were ascertainable as of August 9, 2012, Section 610.027.5 required Appellants to file their claims based upon those violations within one year from that date. Appellants filed their petition on July 28, 2014. Hence, the circuit court properly found that the statute of limitations barred 16 Appellants’ claims,” wrote the appeals court in its decision.

On July 17, the Missouri Supreme Court ruled that the Public Service Commission erred when it refused to allow the construction of the project. The case was sent back to the commission “to determine whether Grain Belt’s proposed utility project is necessary or convenient for the public service.”

Grain Belt Express is proposing the construction of a 780-mile transmission line from wind farms in western Kansas to feed power grids on the East Coast. The company needs to build a direct-current transmission system across Kansas, Missouri, Illinois and Indiana.

Kansas and Indiana have approved the project, as have regulators in Illinois. However, courts in Illinois have blocked the approval, ordering the issue back to state utility regulators.

Opposition in Missouri has been fierce as landowners along the proposed route have organized and fought regulatory approvals needed by Grain Belt to bypass landowners.

Jennifer Gatrel, a spokeswoman for the landowners’ group, said though Tuesday’s ruling is a setback, her members believe they will ultimately be successful in their fight against the Grain Belt project.

“Of course, we are disappointed. … (but) we have a great legal team, and we have other legal resources to continue,” she said.

Michael Skelly, president of Clean Line Energy, said the company that wants to build Grain Belt Express called the appeals court action a “minor technical matter,” and said the company’s attentions are turned to the Public Service Commission, which now must reconsider the case.

“We look forward” to the new hearing, he said.

Monroe County Commissioner Ron Staggssaid he was dismayed with both decisions. The Republican made Grain Belt opposition one of his central campaign themes when he defeated four-term incumbent Glenn Turner in 2016.

“It’s a shame our courts cannot stand up for the individual. I just do not now what to say about it,” Staggs said. “It is disappointing, to say the least.”

Source:  By Forrest Gossett | Gatehouse Media Group | Aug 21, 2018 | www.hannibal.net

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.