[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

High court rejects latest plea to save Fairbank wind turbines  

Credit:  Tim Jamison | The Courier | Jul 24, 2018 | wcfcourier.com ~~

FAIRBANK – The Iowa Supreme Court has dealt another blow to three controversial wind energy turbines just east of Fairbank.

The high court on Tuesday rejected a request from the turbine developers to review a district court order requiring the structures be removed by Dec. 9.

Attorneys for turbine developers – Mason Wind, Dante Wind 6, Galileo Wind 1 and Venus Wind 4 – indicated in a separate district court filing that they have ceased electric production at the project and intend to sign a turbine removal contract by Friday.

The project has been embroiled in litigation since 2015 when the city of Fairbank and surrounding landowners filed a lawsuit against Fayette County and the turbine owners claiming the project was built in violation of county zoning regulations.

They were already providing power to Alliant Energy in 2016 when Judge John Bauercamper sided with the project opponents and ordered the turbines to be removed. That decision was later upheld by the Iowa Court of Appeals.

Bauercamper then ruled June 12 that the county and turbine owners were in contempt of court for failing to remove the structures or post a bond to cover the removal while the issue was pending appeal.

That contempt order required the turbines to cease energy production by July 2, be under a removal contract by July 27 and be removed at the turbine developers’ cost by Dec. 9. Meeting the deadlines would purge the contempt order and potentially more serious penalties the court could impose.

Attorneys were expected to be back in court today to clarify terms related to the removal contract.

A separate case related to the turbines remains active.

The turbine developers had sought a variance to the zoning ordinance – in essence, legalizing them after the fact – from the Fayette County Board of Adjustment but were turned down June 12. The developers have appealed that decision in district court.

Source:  Tim Jamison | The Courier | Jul 24, 2018 | wcfcourier.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

 Follow: