[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

EU’s top court to rule on Tipperary wind farm planning  

Credit:  Seán McCárthaigh | Irish Examiner | Monday, July 16, 2018 | www.irishexaminer.com ~~

The EU’s top court is to rule later this month on whether An Bord Pleanála properly assessed the environmental impact on the habitat of the hen harrier of a proposed €80m wind farm in Tipperary.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has said the challenge by environmentalists to the proposed wind farm (which would be within a designated special protection area) is likely to set case law on wind farms and protected habitats.

An Bord Pleanála had ruled that the measures proposed by ESB Wind Development and Coillte, the joint developers of the wind arm at Keeper Hill, in the Silvermines Mountains, in relation to the preservation of the hen harrier, a protected bird species, had complied with its obligations under the EU Habitats Directive.

The proposed development consists of 16 turbines, as well as access tracks, an electrical transformer station, control buildings, and a substation.

The case was referred to the CJEU by the Supreme Court, which stated there was a difficulty in interpreting the requirements of EU legislation, as the hen harrier habitat was not static, changing due to forestry activity and plantation rotation. It said the maintenance of the special protection area was partly dependent on how the site was managed by human intervention.

The Supreme Court ruled that a judicial review sought by Edel Grace, of Grouse Hall, Milestone, Thurles, had legal standing to challenge An Bord Pleanála’s grant of planning permission for the wind farm at Keeper Hill.

It made no finding about the right of another appellant, Peter Sweetman, a well-known litigant on environmental planning issues, to seek a judicial review.

Both Ms Grace and Mr Sweetman claim that 400 acres of hen harrier foraging would be lost if the proposed wind farm was allowed to be developed, while the existing habitat of the hen harrier would also e destroyed.

The Department of Arts, Heritage, and the Gaeltacht, as well as An Bord Pleanála’s own inspector, had recommended that planning permission for the project should be refused.

North Tipperary County Council had also refused planning permission for the development, in 2013, but its decision was overturned on appeal to An Bord Pleanála.

A legal opinion issued by the CJEU, earlier this year, said the case presented the court with “a timely and valuable opportunity to develop its case law on the EU Habitats Directive.”

Although the legal opinion is not binding, it found that a proposed management plan for the site of the wind farm, which is designed to ensure that the amount of the site suitable as a habitat for the hen harrier was not reduced, could not be regarded as “protective measures.”

If confirmed by the CJEU in its ruling on July 25, it will be a setback for the ESB and Coillte, as An Bord Pleanála would be required to review the application.

Source:  Seán McCárthaigh | Irish Examiner | Monday, July 16, 2018 | www.irishexaminer.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.