[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Land court hears evidence on tourism and peat bog restoration  

Credit:  Written by Hans J Marter | Shetland News | 03 July 2018 | www.shetnews.co.uk ~~

A hearing of the Scottish Land Court got under way in Lerwick on Monday afternoon to determine whether or not Viking Energy can build its planned 103-turbine wind farm on crofting land in the north mainland of Shetland.

The company’s application for consent is challenged by four local crofters, Lorna Moncrieff, Kerry Tait, John Anderson and James Cheyne, who argue that they would be unduly disadvantaged by the wind farm should the project go ahead.

On Monday, two expert witnesses in support of the Viking application gave evidence on tourism, peat restoration and the habitat management plan.

First was Graeme Blackett of economic consultancy Biggar Economics who has been working on the likely impact of wind farm developments on tourism for the last 15 years.

Blackett said that he has been working for clients in the renewables and tourism industries, as well as carrying out independent research, and had never found any “empirical evidence” that tourism is negatively impacted by wind farm developments.

He said that between 2009 and 2015 the capacity of wind farms in Scotland had grown from 3 Gigawatt to 5.3 Gigawatt, while the sustainable tourism sector had grown by 15 per cent. “It can be argued that they can co-exist,” he added.

Under cross-examination from Sustainable Shetland vice-chairman James Mackenzie, who is representing two of the crofters, John Anderson and James Cheyne, Blackett conceded that no such research had ever been carried out for large wind farms in island settings.

Mackenzie also suggested that the visual impact of a large scale development on the land- and seascape of an island might be more significant than elsewhere in Scotland, to which Blackett responded that all his research suggested that people initially expressed fears which usually proved to be unjustified once the wind farm was in place.

Second witness of the day was Dr Simon Zisman, the ecology director Edinburgh based RPS consultants. Formerly of the RSPB, Dr Zisman said he had 25 years experience in wildlife conservation.

His evidence focussed on peat bog restoration and the habitat management plan, which, he said, should benefit moorland birds such as red-throated divers, merlin and the whimbrel.

Dr Zisman said the habitat management plan for the area had the ambitious target of restoring 260 hectares of peat bog to “mitigate the impact of the construction and operation of the wind farm.

He added: “Blanket bog restoration will be able to go ahead without impacting on crofting activity – and will ultimately increase the area that can be used for common grazing,” he said.

The land court hearing continued at the Islesburgh Community Centre on Tuesday morning.

The court is expected to sit all week and is also likely to visit the crofts of those who have objected to the wind farm plans.

A written judgement will be issued some weeks after the hearing.

Source:  Written by Hans J Marter | Shetland News | 03 July 2018 | www.shetnews.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.