[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Oswego County won’t give Mad River Wind Farm tax break  

Credit:  By Marcus Wolf | Watertown Daily Times | May 4, 2018 | www.watertowndailytimes.com ~~

REDFIELD – Oswego County will provide no property tax abatement for developer Avangrid Renewables’s proposed Mad River Wind Farm.

“Just out of the concern for fairness for the rest of the county taxpayers,” said County Administrator Philip R. Church. “We understand that there are a variety of concerns to the impacts of the region up there.”

The developer, which plans to build its 350-megawatt wind farm in the towns of Redfield and Worth, previously secured a payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreement for its Maple Ridge Wind Farm in Lewis County and expressed interest in securing agreements for other projects like its Deer River Wind Farm in the towns of Pinckney, Harrisburg and Montague.

While the company hasn’t discussed having a PILOT for its proposed 88-turbine wind farm in the towns of Redfield and Worth with any stakeholders, the Oswego County Legislature had already passed a resolution in August stating developers would need to pay an amount equal to full taxation for projects with a 25-megawatt output or more.

“I would say as a legislator of Redfield, I would want to see 100 percent” taxation, said County Legislator Margaret A. Kastler, R-Lacona, who represents the towns of Redfield, Sandy Creek and Boylston. “Why not get full taxation if they are going to go through with it?”

The county’s tax policy for large-scale wind farms mirrors the Jefferson County Legislature’s protocol, which also calls for developers to pay an amount equal to full taxation.

Mr. Church said Oswego County’s lawmakers followed “the lead of Jefferson County” because it has dealt with other wind projects. Jefferson County Legislature Chairman Scott A. Gray, R-Watertown, said he met with them to discuss his county’s policy, which he added that Avangrid would have to comply with for its Mad River Wind Farm project.

“I’m pleased to see they have taken the same stance we have taken,” Mr. Gray said. “We basically have a collective voice now in terms of what our expectations are.”

The Oswego County Legislature had previously expressed concerns about whether Avangrid’s wind farm would have adverse economic and environmental effects.

Mr. Church said legislators wanted to learn more about whether Avangrid’s proposed project would contaminate the headwaters of the Salmon River, which provides county residents drinking water and an economic driver with its fishery. The county also expressed concerns about how the project might affect the Tug Hill Aquifer, nearby wetlands, hunting and other outdoor sports that draw tourists to the area in its comments to the state Public Service Commission.

“We thought we were doing our due diligence by asking as many questions as we can,” Mr. Church said. “Our legislature has not taken a formal position for or against the project.”

Avangrid plans to build its wind farm within a 20,000-acre plot of working forest it leased from WoodWise Land Co. and connect it to the Volney-Marcy 345 kilovolts transmission line.

“We are still early in the state’s Article 10 permitting process and we haven’t gotten far enough along to begin specific stakeholder discussions on the local economic benefits, but we anticipate Mad River (Wind Farm) would deliver substantial long-term economic benefits for the community, up to $2 million per year,” said Paul N. Copleman, communications manager for Avangrid, in an email. “We continue to work with the towns of Worth and Redfield on permitting for the project.”

Source:  By Marcus Wolf | Watertown Daily Times | May 4, 2018 | www.watertowndailytimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.