[ exact phrase in "" • ~10 sec • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


LOCATION/TYPE

News Home
Archive
RSS

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Just say ‘no’ to wind project  

Credit:  By Jennifer Genevan | Laughlin Nevada Times | www.mohavedailynews.com ~~

NEEDLES – If the second two meetings went like the first two, support for the Crescent Peak Wind project is scarce. A total of four scoping meetings were held April 9-12 in Searchlight, Needles, Las Vegas and Henderson as part of the environmental impact statement process.

Crescent Peak Renewables, LLC., submitted an application to the Bureau of Land Management requesting authorization to construct, operate, maintain and terminate an up to 500 megawatt wind energy generation facility in November 2015.

Crescent Peak is an acquisition made by Eolous North America Inc., a subsidiary of Eolus. Eolus is a company based in Sweden. Eolous North America also acquired a second wind power project in the Storey, Washoe and Carson City Counties in 2015.

The project study area is 22 miles long and five miles wide. It covers 32,531 acres of public land. It is 10 miles west of Searchlight. The study area is broken into four study areas labeled NV-1, NV-2, NV-3 and NV-4.

Based on information handed out at the meeting in Needles, the wind turbines being considered have a capacity of between 2.0 and 4.5 megawatt per wind turbine and there could be up to 248 turbines.

The turbines would have a three-blade upwind configuration and would be placed in rows according to industry recommendations. The information packet indicated the rows would optimize energy production but minimize land disturbance.

Several factors will go into the design of the turbines including terrain and required mitigation factors. Turbines would operate as independent generators.

Eric Jacobson, of Eolus North America/Crescent Peak Wind, said the purpose of the meeting was to share some information of the project. He described elements of the project.

He discussed a few different maps showing where various public lands are located in relation to the study areas including Wee Thump Joshua Tree, Castle Mountain National Monument, Sloan Canyon Conservation Area and the Walking Box Ranch. He also pointed out neighboring communities of Searchlight, Nipton, Jean, Primm, Cal-Nev-Ari and Palm Gardens.

Jacobson said the estimated disturbed area is at about 750 acres. While there are some big acreage numbers, if the project is permitted, the actual disturbed areas would be less than three percent, he added.

Wind energy production isn’t restricted to daylight hours like solar is, Jacobson said. “This particular site is well suited to complement solar due to the time of delivery pattern of the wind power because the wind blows a lot out there,” he added.

Some studies have begun already with reports pending and more studies are scheduled to begin this month, Jacobson said. Those studies include cultural, biological including endangered species, tribal consultations and visual.

If approved, the project would produce enough clean energy to meet annual energy needs of 75,000 to 150,000 homes, Jacobson said. It would provide millions in sales and property tax revenue annually, he continued.

He said the local communities would benefit from the increased construction activities.

Despite the benefits being laid out, the public commentary seemed to all go in the other direction.

Shannon Salter, a University of Nevada Las Vegas professor, said she feels very strongly about this project because that space out there is a cultural, biological and visual resource. “It’s something we need to protect at all costs,” she added.

She talked about keeping that space sacred in regards to the cultural aspects for the tribes and she expressed concerns about the possibility of disturbing the desert floor that has been shown to have naturally occurring asbestos. Salter also attended the meeting in Searchlight and expressed her concerns at that meeting.

Additional concerns focused on potential ecological impacts including possibly harming various birds such as eagles. Some concerns were related to how naturally occurring asbestos has been found in those areas and the turbines could disturb the desert soil, kicking up the asbestos.

Public comment regarding the project can be made through June 13. Anyone who didn’t attend the meetings can still provide input in assorted ways. Send email to blm_nv_sndo_crescentpeak@blm.gov or fax to 702-515-5023. The question hotline is 702-515-5136. Comments may also be mailed to: BLM Las Vegas Field Office, Las Vegas Field Office Manager, 4701 N. Torrey Pines Dr., Las Vegas, NV 89130.

Visit https://go.usa.gov/xnbwe to review documents and get updated information.

Source:  By Jennifer Genevan | Laughlin Nevada Times | www.mohavedailynews.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate

Share:


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook

Share

CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.
Share

Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter