[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

SWEPCO’s Wind Catcher is not necessary 

Credit:  By Jeffrey Sadow | Minden Press-Herald | Apr 18, 2018 | press-herald.com ~~

The so-called Wind Catcher project might be better named the “Flak Catcher” for all the controversy it has stirred, although unfortunately that seems to have made little impression on Louisiana regulators.

Based in the Oklahoma panhandle, a cluster of 800 wind turbines would capture as much as 2 gigawatts of power and send it through transmission lines to Tulsa and points beyond – although the inefficiency of wind power likely means received output never will come close to reaching this ceiling. Much could go to northwest Louisiana’s SWEPCO, which would own 70 percent of the project.

Its Oklahoma partner (with SWEPCO owned by American Electric Power) started work on this in the middle of last year, then tried to leverage its progress to rush through that state’s approval process. Unlike any other large-scale effort of this kind ever attempted, the $4.6 billion plan would require ratepayers to guarantee payback plus profit beginning with power delivery in 2020. Louisianans would shoulder $900 million of that burden.

But an Oklahoma administrative law judge ruled the partner skirted regulations in trying to get approval in that state, including insufficient proof of need. Texas regulatory staff cited the same reason and disputed the allegation that the project will save ratepayers money over the long haul, noting that federal wind power production tax credits will expire by 2020 (hence the rush for approval), risks of inefficient production and SWEPCO’s historical cost overruns (plus onshore wind power typically costs per unit roughly triple that of fossil fuels when considering all factors such as reliability and subsidies), and risk of lower margins on projected sales.

If only Arkansas and Louisiana regulators were as careful and focused. In February, Arkansas’ staff recommended approval on the basis that SWEPCO provide a number of guarantees, including a cap on construction costs, qualification for 100 percent of the federal Production Tax Credits, and minimum annual production from the project. It also featured a pledge by Wal-Mart and Sam’s Clubs, which cast a long shadow over the state, to buy energy produced by the project.

Presented a similar deal, Louisiana’s Public Service Commission staff took the bait and last week announced in almost identical terms an agreement. As in Arkansas, another sweetener included assurances that the manufacturer of the turbines would have components for these built in all of the affected states except Oklahoma – driving costs higher still, as no American manufacturer makes turbines and thus the parts would have to be shipped abroad, assembled, and imported back.

LPSC commissioners almost always follow staff recommendations, particularly when it fits their ideology. In remarks broadcast last month, area Commissioner Foster Campbell seemed more interested in trying to impugn the motives of organized opposition to the project than in evaluating the data and deciding for himself.

Northwest Louisiana doesn’t need the excess capacity the project will produce and likely its costs will exceed its benefits. The LPSC shouldn’t expect Texas and/or Oklahoma regulators to bail it out and must reject Wind Catcher on its merits.

Jeff Sadow is an associate professor of political science at Louisiana State University Shreveport. His views do not necessarily express those of his employer or this newspaper.

Source:  By Jeffrey Sadow | Minden Press-Herald | Apr 18, 2018 | press-herald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky