[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Inch Cape decision has ‘no link’ to Nicola Sturgeon’s China visit 

Credit:  Gregor Young, Journalist | The National | www.thenational.scot ~~

The decision to call in a planning application for a wind farm development in East Lothian has “no connection whatsoever” to the First Minister’s recent trip to China, MSPs have been told.

The move will see ministers rather than East Lothian Council assess Inch Cape Offshore Limited’s (ICOL) application for planning permission on the site of the former Cockenzie power station.

Local Government Minister Kevin Stewart said the proposed project is in an area covered by the national planning framework and raises issues to be considered by ministers. However, opposition parties have pointed to ICOL’s links to China and Nicola Sturgeon’s recent visit.

The firm is owned by Edinburgh-based Red Rock Power, which in turn is owned by China’s State Development and Investment Corporation (SDIC). Sturgeon met with representatives of SDIC during her visit.

Labour MSP Iain Gray said: “It looks to my constituents as if he [Stewart] is prepared to ride roughshod over their interests and aspirations in order to protect the interests and aspirations of a Chinese-backed project which will create not one job in East Lothian.”

Stewart responded: “I made the decision to call in on April 4. It was relayed to East Lothian Council on April 9, before the First Minister was in China. We have been absolutely clear that there was no connection whatsoever to the First Minister’s visit to China.

“Consideration of planning cases are focused on the merits of the case, the identity of the applicant is not a planning consideration relevant to the assessment of any process.”

Source:  Gregor Young, Journalist | The National | www.thenational.scot

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky