News Home

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

KBIC Tribal Council opposes wind project  

Credit:  Katrice Perkins, Staff Writer | The Daily Mining Gazette | Apr 9, 2018 | www.mininggazette.com ~~

The Keweenaw Bay Indian Community Tribal Council discussed its opposition to the proposed Summit Lake Wind Project at its Saturday meeting.

Council president Warren “Chris” Swartz Jr. discussed his conversation with a Renewable Energy Systems (RES) Group representative and members of the L’Anse Township Board and Planning Commission.

“I was surprised to hear the number of things that this proposed wind project may or may not do, and my biggest concern was the impact it may have on treaty-protected resources and the offsets each one of these turbines displace in terms of land,” said Swartz.

“I’m just concerned that all of these cumulative impacts from industry corporations are going to have an effect on the generations to come,” he added.

Swartz read a draft of a letter he wrote addressed to the L’Anse Township supervisor regarding the proposed Summit Lake Wind Project. The draft proposed that the township “should up their zoning ordinance to include regulations regarding wind turbines to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the community.”

The council was addressed by Fran Whitman and Nancy Haun representing Friends of the Huron Mountains, who presented maps, their thoughts on the proposed RES wind project and a petition with more than 300 signatures of people opposing the projects

They addressed tourism effects and trails, bullying of local council members and asked for the council’s support in opposition.

“Do we advocate the Township Board to make this decision, or do we move forward for a referendum?” Swartz asked. “One reason to move forward with the referendum is I don’t think a referendum has been lost in Michigan in regards to these types of activities.”

Whitman stated on 17 occasions, referendums regarding wind turbines were defeated.

“I’m not against wind energy at all, but I do have a problem when where they’re putting it has absolutely no benefit to the local community,” Tribal Council member Doreen Blaker said,

She added, “I think there’s a place that wind energy can go. …(B)ut I do have a problem when they want to put it in, to me, an area that isn’t sustainable.”

The council agreed to oppose the project and present a resolution at the upcoming L’Anse Township meeting on Wednesday.

Source:  Katrice Perkins, Staff Writer | The Daily Mining Gazette | Apr 9, 2018 | www.mininggazette.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.