[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Most interveners can leave Crocker Wind Farm docket  

Credit:  By Bob Mercer, State Capitol Bureau | Capital Journal | Apr 3, 2018 | www.capjournal.com ~~

Sixty-two of the interveners can stop fighting the Crocker Wind Farm proposal in Clark County.

The South Dakota Public Utilities Commission made the decision Tuesday.

They can do as they choose with information they previously received because developer Geronimo Energy didn’t previously request confidential treatment, commissioners said.

“Once it’s public information, it’s public information,” Commissioner Gary Hanson said.

“I don’t know that Crocker has been treated fairly in this,” Commissioner Chris Nelson said.

But Nelson added he wasn’t sure the commission had legal authority to provide protection Geronimo Energy now requested.

Noted Hanson: “I struggled to find a way to agree with Crocker on this because of fair play.”

Hanson said he hoped the information wouldn’t be misused.

Two interveners remain. They contend some of the turbines would interfere with bird populations that use Reid Lake waterfowl refuge and with a private airport.

The commission starts a three-day hearing on the application May 9.

The 62 jointly asked to drop out after the company wanted to know reasons for their involvement.

Reece Almond, a Sioux Falls lawyer for the interveners, said he couldn’t find any authority that prevented withdrawing.

Almond opposed the company’s request that the withdrawers destroy the information they had received.

“I don’t have anything to hide,” Brett Koenecke, a Pierre lawyer representing Geronimo Energy, responded.

Commission staff lawyer Kristen Edwards said she didn’t object to the withdrawals.

Edwards said information in the commission docket is publicly available to anyone and the appropriate venue for any future challenge would be circuit court.

Koenecke said there weren’t any depositions taken. Koenecke said he didn’t think there was any confidential information on the commission record.

Mollie Smith, a Minneapolis lawyer for Geronimo Energy, said there is confidential information that wasn’t filed.

Smith said documents provided to interveners contained information that wasn’t confidential.

Source:  By Bob Mercer, State Capitol Bureau | Capital Journal | Apr 3, 2018 | www.capjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.