[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home


Credit:  Rutland Herald | March 17, 2018 | www.rutlandherald.com ~~

A news article published this week looking at some of the misconceptions about Vermont’s renewables industry has generated an electrifying debate over how “green” our state actually is – not what it claims to be.

In 2016, the Institute for Energy and the Environment at Vermont Law School was asked to do an analysis of renewable energy credits (REC) in Vermont.

That report pointed out that Vermonters received almost 0 percent of their energy from solar and wind sources, in part because of flawed policies. The report found that nearly all energy credits generated in Vermont were being sold outside of Vermont.

RECs are the means for tracking the production and consumption of renewable energy. When electricity from a renewable energy source enters the electric grid, the electricity is mixed with all other electricity also in the grid, so it is impossible to differentiate between them. They were developed to offer proof of renewable energy production from multiple sources. In effect, RECs are like stocks that can be sold in what amounts to a renewables commodities market. Due to less stringent policies here, nearly all of Vermont’s energy credits have been sold off, sometimes to states looking to bolster their own renewables portfolio.

Compounding the issue is this double whammy: not only do Vermonters not get credit for the renewable energy they generate, the fact that their credits are bought by out-of-state utilities serves as a disincentive for those utilities to build their own renewable facilities in their home states.

While solar panels seem to be everywhere around Vermont because of the recent “solar revolution” here, overall, numbers are low. U.S. solar energy production has experienced unprecedented growth, increasing by 1.2 gigawatts of installed capacity in 2008 to 42.4 gigawatts at the end of 2016. However, even with those dramatic gains, solar energy is still a dim provider, generating less than 1 percent of the total electricity in the United States. According to the Fordham Environmental Law Review, which used the law school report as part of its own analysis of solar growth, a lack of transparency in the solar industry has led to deception in marketing and widespread problems in the industry, including in Vermont. The findings were published in the April 2017 article.

“The U.S. mortgage market, made infamous by the sub-prime mortgage debacle, is the best-known asset-backed security. Securitization, a form of off-balance sheet debt financing, can be applied to the cash flows of aggregated residential solar leases. … The growth of third-party ownership (through REC sales) has thus led to increased opportunities for deceptive practices.”

That’s not to say that has been the motivation here. Solar providers in the state maintain they have been upfront about the ownership of the RECs and clear on who will benefit from them. It is also stipulated as a clause in contracts for solar projects. However, there are solar customers (and critics of the industry) who are calling for more transparency, a tightening of policy loopholes and a push to impose regulations to keep Vermont-made energy in Vermont.

For certain, it is suspect that a state that prides itself in claiming leadership in renewable energy nationwide can only lay claim to owning a handful of renewable energy credits.

“Out-of-state REC sales are one of the biggest contributors toward the growth in electric sector greenhouse gas emissions, and are in direct conflict with the state renewable and greenhouse gas reduction goals,” the review wrote. “… Vermont is not consuming the renewable energy that is generated within its borders and which its citizens are subsidizing.”

It goes on, “When a state like Vermont sets an aggressive (energy) policy but then enacts laws counter to that goal we create false hope about climate change.”

And while Vermont is definitely singled out for its hypocrisy in policies and claims, the authors of the law review remain optimistic that RECs will eventually play their intended role in the energy markets here and across the nation, and that people hoping to “go solar” can truly do so, and feel good about those investments.

“For better or worse,” the law review article concludes, “history has proven that we can only fool the customer for so long and that Mother Nature operates in the realm of science, not perception.”

Source:  Rutland Herald | March 17, 2018 | www.rutlandherald.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)


e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky