[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Council hit with expenses over Perthshire wind farm decision 

Credit:  By Richard Burdge | The Courier | February 21, 2018 | www.thecourier.co.uk ~~

A decision to reject a Perthshire wind farm has been overturned at appeal.

Last year, Perth and Kinross Council refused the 11 turbine wind farm near the existing Drumderg wind farm beside Alyth, on landscape and visual impact grounds.

The company behind the project which, it claims, could create enough electricity to power 19,000 homes, appealed the decision and the Scottish Government reporter has found in its favour.

Andrew Sikes determined the council had “acted in an unreasonable manner” and he also found them liable for expenses.

The site is located 2.8 miles north east of Bridge of Cally and had attracted a number of objectors including the Cairngorms National Park Authority which concluded the turbine blades and hubs would be prominent on the skyline.

The council had argued if the wind farm were allowed to be built it would have an unacceptable impact on tourism in the area.

Mr Sikes said an important factor was the need to identify a location for wind turbine developments saying: “It would make a valuable contribution to the Scottish Government’s renewable energy and carbon reduction targets.”

He noted Alyth Community Council had raised concerns regarding the impact of the development on transport infrastructure as access for heavy goods vehicles would be via Alyth.

During the construction of Drumderg, the village was often choked with heavy traffic

However, in Mr Sikes’ opinion this could be adequately dealt with by imposing conditions.

Mr Sikes concluded that “there are no material consideration which would still justify refusing to grant planning permission”.

In a separate report on expenses he said: “I conclude that the council has behaved unreasonably.

“Its report of handling contains factual errors, fails to accurately describe the assessment of the proposed development by Scottish Natural Heritage and includes an incorrect and misleading summary of that assessment.

“Importantly, the report fails to discuss the conflicting landscape advice it received and explain why it favoured that of the Cairngorms National Park Authority.”

The reporter added the council report “selectively” referred to a tourism study.

The applicants have estimated that £7 million will be injected into the local community during construction.

Source:  By Richard Burdge | The Courier | February 21, 2018 | www.thecourier.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

Tag: Complaints

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon