Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
County could vote on wind ordinance in Feb.
Credit: By: Gordon Woods | Clinton Journal | theclintonjournal.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
CLINTON – A blow was dealt Tuesday to opponents of the Alta Farms wind energy project as the county’s land use committee voted to send its recommendation to the full county board without further changes.
Waynesville residents Ken and Chris Shaffer, supported by a grassroots group calling itself DeWitt County Residents Against Wind Turbines, sought to make changes to a number of sections of the county wind energy ordinance. The Shaffers and others have addressed the land use committee and the county board a number of times since mid-2017 proposing the changes.
While the proposal was about to start the process of making the rounds with the regional planning commission (RPC) and then the zoning board of appeals (ZBA), land use committee action on Tuesday could settle the matter for the time being.
The land use committee earlier had accepted minor changes to some of the county wind code but left the current ordinance largely intact before recommending approval to the county board. Major changes requested to other parts of the code proposed by the Shaffers were not recommended by land use members.
The county board, however, voted to send the proposal in its entirety to the RPC, which would decide changes, if any, it would recommend to the ZBA before final consideration by the board. Board chairman David Newberg suggested this would give the widest possible latitude for considering everything the Shaffers proposed.
But, it would likely be April before the board would again consider the measure based on that scenario. The county board could approve the land use committee’s Tuesday recommendation at its Feb.22 meeting,
* See the full story in the Clinton Journal’s Friday print edition, E-edition and Clinton Journal Web site.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: