[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Regulators urged to reverse ‘net metering’ decision 

Credit:  PUCO hears arguments on solar, wind ruling | Dan Gearino | The Columbus Dispatch | Jan 10, 2018 | www.dispatch.com ~~

Ohio officials made a serious mistake with a recent ruling that will discourage the use of renewable energy systems at homes and businesses, said environmental advocates Wednesday during a rare hearing before state regulators.

Utility companies supported the recent policy shift that reduces some of the financial incentives of using the systems, which include solar panels and wind turbines.

The Public Utilities Commission of Ohio convened oral arguments on the topic as commissioners are trying to decide how to rule on various appeals that were filed in response to a November ruling.

“You should be sending the right signals to get those cost-saving resources onto the grid,” said Madeline Fleisher, an attorney for the Environmental Law & Policy Center, speaking for a coalition of environmental advocates.

She said that consumers’ use of wind and solar power is good for the grid because it reduces the demand for electricity from other sources, which helps to reduce everyone’s cost of electricity during times of peak usage.

The November ruling reduces the amount of credit a customer can receive for excess electricity sold into the grid. This would apply to people whose systems generate enough electricity to offset all of their use, and have some left over.

Steve Nourse, an attorney for American Electric Power, said the PUCO was mostly correct with its November ruling. He noted that consumers still have the ability to offset their own electricity use and have bills that approach close to zero.

He raised the concern that an overly generous payment system would mean that other customers would be left to pick up a larger share of the costs for maintaining the grid.

Rooftop solar customers are “using the grid, and that’s picked up by all of the other customers,” he said.

AEP has about 1,400 customers with their own solar or wind systems, the company says. That is a fraction of 1 percent of the company’s 1.5 million customers in the state.

The case, which has been active since 2012, has been a forum for arguments about the set of policy issues often called “net metering,” which deal with how customers are compensated for the output of their own energy systems.

Among the other key players are businesses that build, develop or install renewable energy systems. They were represented on Wednesday by One Energy of Findlay, a developer of wind energy systems. The company’s attorney, Katie Johnson Treadway, took issue with utility companies’ assertion that some renewable energy systems may be unsafe in certain situations.

“We are not unsafe,” she said. “We are a threat to their business model.”

Her comment was one of the few times such undercurrents came to the surface, touching on how home- and business-based energy systems are competition of sorts for utility companies.

There was little indication of whether any of the arguments were swaying the commissioners. Next, the five-member commission will decide whether to change any aspect of its November ruling, which could happen as soon as the next few weeks.

Asim Haque, the PUCO chairman, said the session was “extraordinarily helpful.” This is the first time the panel has held oral arguments since a 2014 case involving AEP.

Source:  PUCO hears arguments on solar, wind ruling | Dan Gearino | The Columbus Dispatch | Jan 10, 2018 | www.dispatch.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon