[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Apex’s record in Somerset explains community opposition 

Credit:  Christine Bronson Commentary | Lockport Union-Sun & Journal | January 10, 2018 | www.lockportjournal.com ~~

In October 2014 Apex Clean Energy filed a public document with the NYS Department of Public Service. Called the Public Involvement Plan, it is required by Article 10. In it the wind developer outlined [pp. 6-7] its required community outreach to the host communities of Somerset and Yates in the Lighthouse Wind project area. This included:

“A phone poll to understand community sentiment” [and their list of]

“Additional Public Events:

Office open house: A kick-off event to invite people to the Apex office space in town and introduce local contact.

Local workshops offering an introduction to the lighthousewind.com website and instructions on how to give online feedback.

Information booths at local farmer’s market (monthly in season) and participation in a few additional events.

Public information sessions to educate the community on wind energy and the Project. Topics may include:

Turbine Technology: This session would include the basics of how a wind turbine works, a synopsis of changes over the last 15 years, a list of some projects and turbine types, and then a review of the specifications of selected current models.

The Grid: How the grid works and how power is purchased.

Wind/meteorology: How we measure the wind, why some locations are better than others, and how this information contributes to siting

Studies, Impacts, and Mitigation: This session would explain the studies that we will be performing, what they will show us and how we will make modifications to accommodate the results.

Siting: An interactive session that informs the public on what considerations go into siting wind turbines.

Construction and Operations: A presentation about what the community will see during construction and after construction is complete. This session will feature pictures and visual aids to help the public understand what to expect from construction and operations.”

• • •

I have read the contents of 18 event logs filed by Apex on the DPS website from January 2015 to November 2017. There have been no events remotely resembling the above descriptions. There was no telephone poll to gauge residents’ sentiments and there were no “information sessions.”

What I see in Apex event logs consists of assertions that their Barker office was staffed by at least one person during regular hours, and that there was some presence at town board and other official meetings. Any attempt at community outreach was limited to reciting office hours. There is mention that during the July 4th holidays of 2015 and 2016 Apex had a presence in Lyndonville and added Hartland (not a host community) town park in 2017.

If Apex has desired to conduct outreach to these affected communities, it was never done. An individual walking into an Apex office to ask a question is not the same as an event, such as the educational and informative “local workshops” Apex elaborately describes in its PIP.

A year after the PIP we have seen that its Preliminary Scoping Statement was found deficient by the DPS, and yet there was no effort made by Apex to answer specific questions except in the most general and vague terms, and it was allowed to stand as such.

In the last several weeks now Apex has been found out-of-compliance with its met tower in Somerset. Originally, to obtain the permit to erect it (after successfully suing the town) Apex had agreed to conditions set by the town’s planning board. But the requisite reports were never made to the planning board’s stipulations, nor was adequate fencing for the tower constructed.

So what are residents supposed to take from this? It seems that all of this begs the question: if Apex has problems with follow-through, what can we expect when this company begins construction and operation of Lighthouse Wind? Are they rewarded for just “saying anything”?

Where is the accountability here? Who is the watchdog that oversees that Apex will carry out what it promises? People’s health, the environment, quality of life, their greatest financial assets, are all at risk here to a developer that obviously cares not. It’s another reason, going on Year Four, that the overwhelming majority of residents in my town, and those in Yates, have continued to oppose Apex.

Christine Bronson is a member of the Somerset town board.

Source:  Christine Bronson Commentary | Lockport Union-Sun & Journal | January 10, 2018 | www.lockportjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon