[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

when your community is targeted


RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Paypal

Donate via Stripe

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Firm to appeal against rejection of Borders wind farm bid 

Credit:  By Paul Kelly | The Southern Reporter | 09 January 2018 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk ~~

An energy firm is to take its rejected bid to build a wind farm near Bonchester Bridge to the Scottish Government, it has emerged.

Its application to erect 12 wind turbines on the Harwood Estate was thrown out by Scottish Borders Council’s planning and building standards committee last November.

The bid to create what was to be called Pines Burn wind farm had divided opinion, 54 letters of objection having been tabled alongside 30 submissions of support during the planning process.

All six community councils affected – those at Southdean, Upper Teviotdale, Hobkirk, Newcastleton, Denholm and Hawick – were against the proposals, however.

Rejecting their officers’ advice, councillors on the planning committee concluded that the seven 149.9m-high turbines and five to stand at 130m high would have an “adverse impact on the landscape, as well as having an impact on nearby historical sites”.

Now Leeds-based Energiekontor UK has submitted a plea for a rethink to the Scottish Government’s planning and environmental appeals division. That appeal will be considered within the next few months.

Defending the plans at November’s planning committee, Energiekontor project manager Duncan Taylor said: “This unique application is the only one in your area that has ever had the support of your planning service.

“If approved, we will build Pines Burn as a completely subsidy-free wind farm, something we would be immensely proud of.”

Speaking after the rejection, he added: “We are understandably disappointed by the decision. We are now considering our options.”

Source:  By Paul Kelly | The Southern Reporter | 09 January 2018 | www.thesouthernreporter.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)
Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)


e-mail X FB LI TG TG Share

News Watch Home

Get the Facts
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.


Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook

Wind Watch on Linked In Wind Watch on Mastodon