[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Developers halt Swanton Wind plans, blaming opposition in high places  

Credit:  By Mike Polhamus | Nov 28 2017 | vtdigger.org ~~

Backers of a planned seven-turbine wind energy project in Swanton said this week they’re withdrawing their application for a state permit.

A combination of factors led to the decision, said Nick Charyk, a spokesman for the Swanton Wind project, who characterized this as “a pause, not a halt.”

The factors he cited include Gov. Phil Scott, who campaigned in part on opposition to further large-scale wind energy development.

The Scott-appointed chairman of the Public Utility Commission, Anthony Roisman, also has “been public about his desire to stop wind,” Charyk said. The PUC recently adopted sound limits for wind turbines that environmentalists say will prevent future wind energy development in the state. Projects like the one proposed in Swanton require a permit from the commission.

A further obstacle is the tax plan before Congress, Charyk said, which was developed by House Republicans hoping to roll back tax benefits for wind energy. That proposal, he said, “is having a chilling effect on the industry at large.”

Proponents of Swanton Wind had billed it as a model for other wind energy developers to follow, as they offered to buy out neighbors bothered by the sound the turbines produced.

But neighbors of the proposed project believed the turbines wouldn’t just create noise.

They have said the installation would require an interstate-sized roadway built to the top of the hillside where the turbines were to be located.

Some also cited fears that the project would crack their homes’ foundations and introduce carcinogenic radon into their basements; poison the water in their wells; and cause cardiac illness and other physical ailments.

The bid by Travis and Ashley Belisle to put wind turbines on the hill they own behind their Swanton house has been expensive and frustrating, Charyk said, but he added that it may not have been futile.

The Belisles’ property remains a good location for a wind project, Charyk said, and people will probably want to take advantage of that at some point in the future.

Source:  By Mike Polhamus | Nov 28 2017 | vtdigger.org

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


Tag: Victories

News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.