[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

News Watch Home

Approved wind farm project sparks debate  

Credit:  By Jaret Lansford, Weekend Meteorologist/Multimedia Journalist | KTIV | October 24, 2017 | www.ktiv.com ~~

Tensions were high Tuesday morning as the Palo Alto Board of Supervisors prepared to vote on the proposal for the county’s first wind farm.

Even the board was split and said it was a hard decision that has weighed on them.

“I haven’t had a full night’s sleep in the last month,”

Board members said they looked at other examples to help in the decision process.

“Every one of us, collectively or individually, have talked to surrounding counties, surrounding wind farms throughout the region and throughout the state. We’ve gotten feedback from them.” said Roger Faulstick, County Supervisor.

After lots of discussion, and final vote of 3-2, the proposal was passed.

Some say the proposal brings some major positives.

“If you have an opportunity to look at a project like this from an economic standpoint. No matter what your personal feelings are, you absolutely have to look at it for the betterment of the county’s economic health.” said Faulstick.

Others see more negatives.

A common theme was worry about the impact the turbines would have on farmland.”We feed millions of people. We are part of the economy of the world, not just here in Palo Alto County. The industrial part of this is utilizing prime, taking it out of production, land forever.” said Lois Stillman, landowner.

Another concern raised were the location and number of turbines.

“The real thing is there were way too many turbines and they are way too close to the people who live out here.” said Tom Stillman, farmer.

Opponents say they hope the board will consider looking into a compromise.

“Make an ordinance that will not impact our environment, our neighbors and place them in proper places that are not harming all of these places.” said Lois Stillman.

Until then, the turbines issue continues to charge up residents.

Source:  By Jaret Lansford, Weekend Meteorologist/Multimedia Journalist | KTIV | October 24, 2017 | www.ktiv.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.



Wind Watch on Facebook

Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

National Wind Watch