[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Savoy voters reject bylaw change that would have allowed for taller turbines in wind energy project  

Credit:  By Adam Shanks | The Berkshire Eagle | www.berkshireeagle.com ~~

SAVOY – Town voters soundly rejected a bylaw amendment that would have allowed taller wind turbines on Wednesday.

By a vote of 126 to 53, voters shot down the proposal to amend a bylaw that would allow Minuteman Wind LLC and its partner, Palmer Capital Corp., to increase the height of its West Hill turbine blades from 425 to 453 feet.

The proposed amendment required a two-thirds majority to pass.

The special town meeting drew a crowd of Savoy residents that filled the Savoy Fire House on Main Road.

Unlike previous meetings that became controversial, there was little discussion on the proposal prior to it coming to a vote by secret ballot. At times, the fire house was so loud that the town clerk struggled to hear voters as they came forward for a ballot.

“Our next step is to regroup as a project team and figure out what we’re going to do,” said Lindsay Deane-Mayer, the project manager for Palmer Management on behalf of Minuteman Wind. “I think the town spoke, obviously, about the height of the turbines and not wanting longer blades.”

There remains an active permit for five turbines at the site.

“I think it’s important for the public to know that they can always ask questions about the project,” Deane-Mayer said.

Representatives for the developer had argued that the additional height would increase the installation’s energy output from the five turbines some 15 percent, reaching the 12.5 megawatts it had originally planned for.

With smaller blades, the estimated output would be approximately 11 megawatts.

The original bylaw, which sets the parameters for the West Hill wind installation, was approved by town voters in 2008.

Company representatives have said that the change was required because the original turbines are no longer manufactured, prompting it to explore alternatives.

The boost in production at the windfarm would be a windfall for the town, the project’s advocates argued, due to the structure of its planned payment in lieu of taxes (PILOT) agreement with the town.

When they initially submitted the proposal, developers initially told town officials the PILOT would exceed $200,000, according to Select Board Chairman John Tynan.

But since the wind farm project was resurrected about 18 months ago, the proposed annual PILOT has fallen to $73,000.

“Since [April], there hasn’t been a lot of movement,” Tynan said.

A deal has yet to be struck, and Tynan told the crowd on Wednesday that the parties remain about $100,000 apart.

“We’re just trying to take care of the town,” Tynan told The Eagle.

Deane-Mayer said PILOT negotiations will continue.

“The longer blades would have yielded a much higher PILOT payment, so that’s something the town is aware of. We will work with them,” Deane-Mayer said.

Many residents have raised opposition to the plans, citing concerns about its impact to their quality of life and health.

Pat Palmer, a Holly Road resident, said those who live near wind turbines in Florida had sparked concern among Savoy residents. She also questioned the PILOT payment.

“They’re not going to get the money they think they’re going to get,” Palmer said.

Wes Briggs was also against the proposal, citing the noise generated by the turbines and their potential health impacts.

“It wasn’t really about the length of the blades,” Briggs said.

Sarah Satterthwaite said she had “mixed feelings” about the proposal and felt as though she had to choose between climate change, which she cited as a concern, and her neighbors.

“Every neighbor was worried about them,” said Satterthwaite, who also recalled hearing tales from Florida residents about what it’s like to live near turbines.

Source:  By Adam Shanks | The Berkshire Eagle | www.berkshireeagle.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.