LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Ogle Township supervisors stick by wind law 

Credit:  By David Hurst | The Tribune-Democrat | www.tribdem.com ~~

Ogle Township supervisors spent the past four months reading through stacks of documents provided by a group of township landowners working to convince the board to bolster a local law that regulates wind farms.

But in the end, supervisors said they didn’t find a single, supportable reason to amend their law.

Board members decided against changing their 2007 windmill regulations at their meeting Monday. In a 3-0 vote, supervisors declined the residents’ petition pressing for greater setbacks.

They then spent 15 minutes defending the move in a back-and-forth exchange with Joseph Cominsky, an outspoken Shaffer Mountain wind farm critic.

“The way I see it, our ordinance is fine the way it is,” supervisors Chairman Harvey Weyandt Jr. said, blaming “misinformation” about windmills for creating a stir in the municipality. “If we change our ordinance, the residents who do want to see (the project occur) won’t be able to.”

Cominsky and two other meeting attendees criticized the board for the move, accusing the township of selling out to the wind industry.

Cominsky, a Paint Township resident who owns land on Shaffer Mountain, pointed to the fact that the township’s ordinance requires developers to pay the municipality a yearly fee of $1,500 per megawatt.

Fred Paulovich, a Windber man who also owns Ogle Township land, cited safety as his concern. He worried that current setbacks wouldn’t protect residents or a passing car from being struck by ice that can accumulate and get thrown from spinning blades in the winter.

But Weyandt said the area eyed for windmills is a wooded, remote area even by the township’s standards – far removed from full-time residences and more than 2 miles from Ogletown.

And the township’s windmill guidelines give it the leverage to negotiate with wind companies planning an Ogle wind farm, he said after the meeting. The board could require the company to shut down turbines near roads if temperatures dipped to a certain point in the winter, he said.

Weyandt did not debate that other townships have stricter setbacks than Ogle.

“But those are more populated towns. These companies are looking at a place that no one’s ever going to develop,” he said of the vast Berwind property beyond Mount Carmel Drive.

Ogle Township requires turbines to be installed no closer than twice the height of a turbine’s hub, likely 600 feet or more, from the nearest non-participating property owner. A windmill cannot be any closer than five times the turbine’s hub height from a building foundation.

Weyandt said the board relied on the state Association of Townships’ recommendations when drafting its original law and modified it to fit its community.

And many other communities have adopted the same per-megawatt fee, board members noted.

“We put a lot of work into that,” Supervisor Dan Sklinar added.

The ordinance requires companies planning a wind farm in the township to file a formal application that lists where turbines would be placed, the size of the farm and access points, among other details. A public meeting is required, and the company would be expected to attend, giving the township and developers a chance to work through local concerns before approval would be granted, Weyandt said.

Source:  By David Hurst | The Tribune-Democrat | www.tribdem.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky