[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Residents lobby county for more wind turbine rules  

Credit:  Tim Jamison | The Courier | August 2, 2017 | wcfcourier.com ~~

WATERLOO – A group of rural Black Hawk County residents is pushing for more zoning restrictions on industrial wind energy turbines.

Members of Cedar Valley Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy asked the county Board of Supervisors on Tuesday to schedule a public work session or place their request on a future meeting agenda for debate.

“We believe the ordinance in Black Hawk County should be reviewed and updated based on changes we see in wind energy generation systems we see in the United States and how those things can impact Black Hawk County,” said Patrick Dillon, an attorney hired by the residents.

“We specifically want to build a more robust ordinance that can balance the needs of landowners who want to take advantage of wind power generation with those that are going to live in the area where that power is generated,” he added.

Cedar Valley Citizens for Responsible Wind Energy was formed by residents living south Waterloo where DeSoto-based RPM Access is working on plans to develop a 70 megawatt wind farm with an estimated 35 turbines.

RPM Access is expected to file its zoning applications later this year, which would prompt hearings before the county’s Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of Adjustment.

But many property owners in the project vicinity believe the current county requirements for wind turbines are inadequate to protect them from harm and lost property values. They’ve voiced frustration about their inability to have input in the project or the zoning ordinance to date.

Wayne McGarvey asked the supervisors to consider more zoning rules, including a lower sound threshold from the turbines and requiring farther distances from property lines.

“I don’t think our ordinance with a 60 decibel sound limit and no word of a setback from an occupied residence protects my health and well-being,” McGarvey said. “In effect, they have trespass rights on my property with ice throw, blade throw, whatever. That isn’t right.”

Resident Greg Cory joined those calling for county government leaders to start the discussion now.

“I’m smack dab in the middle of where this proposed wind farm is going to go,” Cory said. “… This is affecting your neighbors quite drastically. Please put us on your agenda.”

Cory said real estate studies show property values are lower near wind turbines, noting one of his neighbors just saw the sale of her acreage fall through when the buyer learned of RPM Access’s plans.

“We’re asking for a property value guarantee as one of the items to be added to the Black Hawk County wind ordinance,” he said. “A property value guarantee should be required by a developer.”

Resident Rusty Bowman was unhappy only property owners planning to allow a turbine on their land have been involved in the discussion with RPM Access.

“If they’re moving into our neighborhood we need to be involved,” Bowman said. “I think it should be more transparent.”

The Board of Supervisors has been reluctant to date to schedule a public meeting on the zoning ordinance. Dillon had requested a moratorium on wind turbine projects and asked for a work session on the zoning ordinance in a June 16 letter to the board.

“If we’re going to have a work session or an agenda item we need something specific to discuss,” said board chairman Frank Magsamen. “We need to sit down with (county zoning staff) and do a review again to get some feedback before we even discuss having an agenda item or a work session.”

Meanwhile, Magsamen said he would encourage RPM Access officials to hold informational meetings with all residents living near the project area.

Source:  Tim Jamison | The Courier | August 2, 2017 | wcfcourier.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.