[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Judge recuses himself from WECS cases  

Credit:  By Travis Weik | The Courier-Times | June 13, 2017 | www.thecouriertimes.com ~~

Henry Circuit Court 1 Judge Bob Witham has recused himself from two judicial review requests that were filed in May.

The cases involve appealing a section of the county’s development code that deals with wind energy conversion systems (WECS). The judicial review filings are to determine if the Henry County WECS ordinance is valid and if the planning commission has the legal authority to authorize commission approved uses for meteorological towers.

Witham said he has a family member who sat on the Henry County Planning Commission in 2009 when the current WECS ordinance was adopted and felt that it was best to step away from the case.

According to court filings, the “Code of Judicial Conduct requires the disqualification of the Judge under circumstances which might create the appearance of impropriety.”

Court documents show that Witham disqualified and recused himself from further action on both cases Wednesday.

Following the local rules for the Henry County court system, a special panel was selected to replace Witham as the judge for both cases. The panel includes Delaware Circuit Court 3 Judge Linda Wolf, Jay Superior Court Judge Max C. Ludy, and Randolph Superior Court Judge Peter D. Haviza.

The petitioners – a group consisting of residents from Middletown, Straughn, New Castle, Shirley, Spiceland, Mooreland, Sulphur Springs and Hagerstown – have until June 17 to strike one of the judges from the panel.

The respondents – the Henry County Planning Commission, the Henry County Commissioners, and Big Blue River Wind Farm, LLC – will have 10 days from that decision to strike a second judge from the panel, leaving one special judge to review the claims.

Source:  By Travis Weik | The Courier-Times | June 13, 2017 | www.thecouriertimes.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.