[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Letter: Officials went against the people  

Credit:  Albert Lea Tribune | May 24, 2017 | www.albertleatribune.com ~~

Nestled above the Iowa border is Freeborn County’s London Township. The residents go about their business, bother nobody, descended from immigrants who fled Europe’s burdensome taxes and government rule, coming to America to live the dream of liberty, and have opportunities according to abilities, not birthright. Settlers were hard-working, self-sufficient and elected church, school, township and county boards who represented their belief in frugality, low taxes, freedom and property rights. Life was good in peaceful London Township.

Until now. Today’s generation living in London Township faces loss of that peaceful way of life, with neighbor against neighbor, division in churches, people not speaking to one another – all because of 500-foot industrial wind turbines (not your grandfather’s windmills) coming near peoples’ homes. These turbines will scar the landscape – blinking red lights visible for 30 miles, flickering shadows, inescapable hum and vibration, lowering property values. Local government and community leaders we trusted failed us. They wouldn’t support our request (wanted by 70 percent of London Township residents) that the county study further setbacks from homes for the new, bigger turbines. From what I understood, Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Randy Kehr said setbacks shouldn’t be changed and wants as many turbines as possible in Freeborn County. (Wind farm developer Invenergy had joined the chamber.) Economic development head Ryan Nolander spoke in favor of the wind farm bringing jobs (possibly 10, when in the same month under his watch industries left Albert Lea, losing 120 jobs.) Commissioner Shoff voted no, parroting Invenergy’s developer, saying a Canadian survey said there were no ill effects from turbines. Commissioner Mathiason voted no, saying he knew the negative aspects of wind turbines close to homes, but the county will receive income. Commissioner Nelson, with property slated to get windmills, abstained, causing the vote to study setbacks to fail. All chose money over people! They decided it will be OK for other people to suffer so that some money can come into the county. None of those people will live next to the turbines, but they think it’s good for others to live next to them because there is money involved! Betrayal for 30 pieces of silver is alive and well.

Xcel Energy will take over the wind project, though their goal of 25 percent renewable energy in Minnesota by 2025 has already been met. Xcel President Jeff Berrington got a permit from Minnesota Department of Natural Resources this March to remove a bald eagle nest in a wind farm in Mower County and dispose of nest material “to ensure safe operation of wind turbines for bald eagle safety.” Someone said the permit was given because the wind farm was there first, and eagles moved in afterward. We already have eagles in London Township. Can we get a permit to remove and dispose of wind turbines because the eagles and residents were here first? Would Mr. Berrington be upset if, within three blocks of his home, someone constructed a wind turbine taller than the Foshay tower, with spinning blades diameter bigger than the Vikings’ football field?

Henry Tews


London Township

Source:  Albert Lea Tribune | May 24, 2017 | www.albertleatribune.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.