LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]



Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Get weekly updates

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

‘We’ll have what they’re having’ 

Credit:  Christine Bronson | Lockport Union-Sun & Journal | April 28, 2017 | www.lockportjournal.com ~~

According to a state press release dated April 21, the New York Department of Environmental Conservation bought 17 acres “in the historic maritime hamlet of Setauket” with state Environmental Protection Funds. Why? “For watershed protection, forest health, and passive recreation in accordance with a Unit Management Plan that will be developed in the near future with community input.”

DEC Commissioner Basil Seggos praised the governor, saying, “… to purchase this parcel shows Governor Cuomo’s continued commitment to protecting our waterfront resources.”

Setauket is a charming (now more so) village on Long Island’s north shore. The purchased property is described as a “crucial link in a string of green, recreational, educational, and historic spaces” going from the Greenway Trail through park lands, and ending at the Fitzsimmons property, the name of the newly acquired green space. The parcel had long concerned the community “because of its potential for residential development, which would have increased runoff entering the watershed and the Long Island Sound.” State Assemblyman Steve Englebright added, “The acquisition will preserve in perpetuity the rural character of [this] corridor.” A Brookhaven Town official remarked that she was “excited to celebrate Earth Day by drawing attention to the natural resources in our community.”

Nature author and Setauket resident Carl Safina was very grateful that the state demonstrated such a respect for nature and the citizens who want to preserve it. “One of the things that makes living in Setauket so delightful and exceptional,” he remarked, “is the mix of residential and preserved space. It’s important not only for the physical beauty of the area but also for the birds and other wildlife that make life here so interesting. We are really pleased and gratified that this natural beauty we enjoy so much will be a permanent feature of our neighborhood.”

The state’s purchase downstate begs the question, what about upstate?

Why is it that we residents of Somerset and Yates, New York, have been pleading with the state and Governor Cuomo, writing almost 1,000 letters to the Public Service Commission in the past three years, for exactly what the residents of downstate Setauket have received? We have our own historic and scenic Seaway Trail corridor. We, too, seek protection from industrial development becoming a permanent feature of our two towns. We would be pleased and gratified if the governor took notice of the natural resources we have in abundance, and that need protection. And if residents here were allowed “community input,” Apex’s 650-foot wind turbine project called Lighthouse Wind would have been nixed two years ago.

We, too, love our rural homes, our open spaces, wildlife, raptors, song birds, peace, quiet, nighttime stars, and lake waves. All told, they make life here interesting for us.

Preserving rural character of an area? Drawing attention to a community’s natural resources? Commitment to protecting waterfront resources? Community input? Somerset and Yates want all this, as well.

Let’s see Governor Cuomo’s true “continued commitment” for protecting the quality of life for all New Yorkers, even ones who don’t live on Long Island.

Christine Bronson is a Somerset resident.

Source:  Christine Bronson | Lockport Union-Sun & Journal | April 28, 2017 | www.lockportjournal.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky