LOCATION/TYPE

NEWS HOME

[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


Archive
RSS

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

WHAT TO DO
when your community is targeted

Get weekly updates
RSS

RSS feeds and more

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate via Stripe

Donate via Paypal

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links

Alerts

Press Releases

FAQs

Campaign Material

Photos & Graphics

Videos

Allied Groups

Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005.

News Watch Home

Charity facing big court bill after unsuccessful bid to halt Highland windfarm 

Credit:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | April 26, 2017 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk ~~

Wild land charity the John Muir Trust is bracing itself for a massive legal bill after failing to have the plugs pulled on power company SSE’s Stronelairg Windfarm scheme.

The amount is not yet clear. The trust has already paid the Scottish Government £75,000 as a result of its unsuccessful judicial review.

SSE confirmed that it had asked the Court of Session to rule on expenses incurred in the wake of the final approval for its 67-turbine development on 8,650 acres at the south end of Loch Ness.

The firm states on its website that it had “no option but to allow the independent court process determine what it believes is reasonable and appropriate.”

Written objections from the public outnumbered letters of support for the project by 15 to one. It was also opposed by the Cairngorms National Park Authority, the Mountaineering Council of Scotland and three out of four local councillors.

The windfarm promises to power more than 100,000 homes.

The trust would not comment yesterday beyond a website statement to its supporters.

It said: “We’ve been deeply disappointed to have received notification from SSE that they want to pursue JMT for costs and have declared these at £350,000 – which is three times what was previously intimated.

“The final liability will not be known for a few weeks, once the court have decided the final costs. We will make strong representation around the issues of fairness and proportionality.”

Source:  By Iain Ramage | The Press and Journal | April 26, 2017 | www.pressandjournal.co.uk

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Contributions
   Donate via Stripe
(via Stripe)
Donate via Paypal
(via Paypal)

Share:

e-mail X FB LI M TG TS G Share


News Watch Home

Get the Facts
CONTACT DONATE PRIVACY ABOUT SEARCH
© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.

 Follow:

Wind Watch on X Wind Watch on Facebook Wind Watch on Linked In

Wind Watch on Mastodon Wind Watch on Truth Social

Wind Watch on Gab Wind Watch on Bluesky