[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

State board rejects Icebreaker wind project’s request for certification; LEEDCO vows to reapply  

Credit:  By James F. McCarty, The Plain Dealer | April 06, 2017 | www.cleveland.com ~~

CLEVELAND, Ohio – Birding groups and environmentalists are heralding the state’s decision this week to reject a request to certify construction of a wind turbine project planned for Lake Erie in 2018.

Officials at the Lake Erie Energy Development Corp., however, said they considered the rejection a “bump in the road” to certification, and they plan to file updated documents in a few weeks that they expect will be approved by the Ohio Power Siting Board.

The certification is required before the $120 million Icebreaker project can move forward with plans to build six wind turbines about eight to 10 miles off the coast of Cleveland – the nation’s first offshore fresh water wind farm.

In a letter to LEEDCO President Lorry Wagner, siting board Chairman Asim Hague said the application “has been found not to comply” with Ohio law due to insufficient information.

LEEDCO must obtain two Memorandums of Understanding involving monitoring studies and analyses of the project’s impact on birds, bats and fisheries. The memos must first be endorsed by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.

“We’ve been in contact with ODNR to finalize these quickly and to move on to the next step,” said Dave Karpinski, LEEDCO’s vice president of operations.

“We obviously wished that everything would have sailed through. But we’ve filed several thousand papers, and all they found out of place were these two documents,” Karpinski said. “It’s a technicality of timing that we want to remedy quickly with the ODNR.”

The opposing sides could hardly disagree more over the potential impact the wind turbines would have on birds, bats and fish.

The Oak Harbor, Ohio-based Black Swamp Bird Observatory and the American Bird Conservancy filed documents with the siting board last week in which they argued that the wind project would pose a devastating threat to birds and bats passing through one of the nation’s busiest migratory flyways.

They noted that Icebreaker is only the tip of the iceberg: at least 2,700 wind turbines could be erected in Lake Erie if LEEDCO’s pilot project is permitted to go through.

“It is therefore essential that every effort be made by LEEDCo to prepare a fundamentally sound, quantitative risk assessment of mortality to bird and bat species known to be in the area, especially protected species covered by the Endangered Species Act, Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act,” their letter read.

Recent tracking studies found that the endangered Kirtland’s warbler passes directly over the proposed site of the Icebreaker wind farms during spring and fall migrations, the birding groups wrote.

In a letter to the siting board, chief scientist Gary Langham and eight other representatives of the National Audubon Society, acknowledged that wind energy is a key part of combating the effects of climate change on birds. But they emphasized it’s essential that the Icebreaker wind project mitigate any environmental impacts on birds and wildlife because it will likely provide the standard for future wind farms on the Great Lakes.

Langham criticized LEEDCO’s application as incomplete in its data collection and faulty in its analyses of environmental impacts to birds and other wildlife.

Langham cited two studies LEEDCO submitted in support of its contention that the wind project would have no destructive environmental impact. They included an analysis of radar to predict impacts to nocturnal migratory birds, and a Risk Assessment for Birds and Bats culled from published European studies on land-based wind projects.

“We find no data collected at the project site itself,” Langham wrote.

In a report filed last November, however, Caleb Gordon, an ornithologist from Houston hired as a consultant to LEEDCO, called Icebreaker the lowest-risk project of any he has worked on during eight years of studying wind farms.

Gordon praised the offshore Cleveland site as the best location for safeguarding migrating birds and bats.

If the siting board approves LEEDCO’s application, the agency then will have 90 days to decide the merits of the project, Karpinski said. Public hearings would follow.

“What we really need is a ruling that puts Lake Erie off-limits for wind development,” said wind-power opponent Laura Jackson, president of Save Our Allegheny Ridges.

Source:  By James F. McCarty, The Plain Dealer | April 06, 2017 | www.cleveland.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.