[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Consolidated Edison proceeds: PUC hearing vs. Northwestern  

Credit:  By Bob Mercer, Public Opinion Capitol Bureau | Watertown Public Opinion | April 4, 2017 | www.thepublicopinion.com ~~

PIERRE – Consolidated Edison Development gets four days to make its case next week before the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, regarding NorthWestern Energy’s position on avoided costs for power that ConEd wants to supply from wind farms in Brule, Aurora and Sanborn counties.

NorthWestern Energy’s expert holds that his model is correct. ConEd Development’s expert conducted an analysis that priced it higher.

In a March 31 memorandum ConEd pointed out a “critical flaw” in NorthWestern Energy’s approach: “There is no evidence that those prices are either valid or representative of the wholesale market prices at which NWE completes transactions.”

The evidentiary hearing is Tuesday, April 11, through Friday, April 14, in room 413 of the Capitol. It starts at 8 a.m. CT with exhibit marking and gets into full gear at 9 a.m. with arguments.

Juhl Energy, the predecessor to ConEd, began negotiation with NorthWestern Energy in October 2015. The sides eventually agreed the negotiation was pointless and PUC intervention was necessary.

ConEd purchased the wind farms last year. They are Brule County Wind, located near Kimball; Aurora County Wind, located near White Lake; and Sanborn County Wind, located near Letcher.

The wind farms, each 20 megawatts, are eligible under federal law to supply NorthWestern Energy at full avoided cost.

Source:  By Bob Mercer, Public Opinion Capitol Bureau | Watertown Public Opinion | April 4, 2017 | www.thepublicopinion.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.