Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
House rejects what opponents called an ‘anti-wind’ amendment to a study bill
Credit: By Dave Thompson | Prairie Public Broadcasting | April 4, 2017 | prairiepublic.org ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
The House has rejected an amendment to a power generation study bill that opponents said would have severely restricted wind power development in North Dakota.
The amendment would have required the Public Service Commission to consider “need” when siting a new power generation facility. Supporters said all this does is ask the PSC to do its job.
“This is not a war on wind thing,” said Rep. Todd Porter (R-Mandan). “This is making sure that the next one in isn’t causing someone else to drop out.”
But opponents said it is designed to favor coal over wind. And they said North Dakota could potentially lose millions of dollars in wind power development.
“So why do we want to hang a ‘Closed For Business’ sign on North Dakota?” said Rep. David Monson (R-Osnabrock).
The amendment was rejected 62 to 27. After that, House Majority Leader Al Carlson urged the House to kill the study – which it did on a 77 to 13 vote. The study had passed the Senate.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
(via Stripe) |
(via Paypal) |
Share: