[ exact phrase in "" • results by date ]

[ Google-powered • results by relevance ]


News Home

Subscribe to RSS feed

Add NWW headlines to your site (click here)

Sign up for daily updates

Keep Wind Watch online and independent!

Donate $10

Donate $5

Selected Documents

All Documents

Research Links


Press Releases


Publications & Products

Photos & Graphics


Allied Groups

Carbon judge hears turbine case  

Credit:  By Judy Dolgos-Kramer | Times News | December 21, 2016 | www.tnonline.com ~~

Carbon County County Judge Steven Serfass heard arguments Tuesday in Atlantic Wind’s case against Penn Forest Township’s zoning hearing board.

Atlantic Wind asked the court to order a change of venue and to remove the Penn Forest Township zoning hearing board in favor of an independent hearing officer.

During Tuesday’s hearing, zoning board solicitor Matthew Rapa told Serfass that the request is “unprecedented” and that there is little to no case law supporting the applicant’s request.

“The court has no subject matter jurisdiction to appoint an independent hearing officer,” Rapa said. “The (Municipal Planning Code) only allows for the board itself to appoint a hearing officer.”

Rapa said the court may only hear the matter on appeal and that unless the zoning hearing board was permitted to continue to the conclusion of the hearings, there would be no complete record for the court to review and consider.

Rapa said there had already been “four or five hearings, lasting several hours each,” and that the record was almost complete.

Rapa said the meetings did sometimes get a “bit rowdy and unruly” but that the board members did not feel a need to remove themselves from the proceedings.

“Atlantic Wind has not had any interference with their ability to present witnesses or to cross-examine witnesses put on by the objectors,” Rapa said. “There has been no indication from the board members that they believe that they would be unable to make a fair and impartial decision in this matter.”

Attorney Jonathan Bradbard spoke on behalf of Atlantic Wind.

“This is an extraordinary case. We could find no cases of threats against the zoning hearing board,” said Bradbard when he addressed the court. “Atlantic Wind is not objecting to the procedure in this matter, but the venue and the manner in which they are being heard.”

“How does appointing a hearing officer address your safety concerns?” Serfass asked Bradbard.

“Each meeting became more unruly, more emotionally charged,” Bradbard said. “We question how that affects the mindset of the board, how does that go to their objectivity. This is the atmosphere that the applicant has to operate in.”

“I see this as a venue issue mainly,” said Serfass. “Have any of the members of the board offered to recuse themselves? Don’t you think if they felt that way they would step down?”

“We just want to make sure that the people deciding this matter are making those decisions with a clear head,” Bardbard said.

In rebuttal, Rapa added that Atlantic Wind only raised these concerns after five hearings and that it was Atlantic Wind’s own security team that was seen to be armed at the hearings.

“There simply is no case law where the court has taken the matter out of the hands of the (zoning hearing board),” Rapa said. “We believe that a change of venue would cure all of Atlantic Wind’s concerns.”

Bardbard said that once the record is complete, it goes to the court on appeal as is. There is no background in the record, so if the record is tainted by something, there is nothing there that the appeals officer would see.

“What is to stop this from affecting the hearing officer?” Serfass asked Bradbard. “What is to stop you from coming back to us with the same argument later?”

Serfass continued the stay of the proceedings to give the court time to consider the matter. Rapa was given two weeks to review additional case law and provide any additional information to the court for consideration. Bradbard was given an additional 10 days to respond to any new filings by Rapa.

The soonest the matter will be decided will be mid- to late-January.

Source:  By Judy Dolgos-Kramer | Times News | December 21, 2016 | www.tnonline.com

This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.

The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.

Wind Watch relies entirely
on User Funding
Donate $5 PayPal Donate


News Watch Home

Get the Facts Follow Wind Watch on Twitter

Wind Watch on Facebook


© National Wind Watch, Inc.
Use of copyrighted material adheres to Fair Use.
"Wind Watch" is a registered trademark.