| Wind Watch is a registered educational charity, founded in 2005. |
Wind turbines hinder military readiness, state lawmaker argues
Credit: By Asher Price - American-Statesman Staff | Austin American-Statesman | December 15, 2016 | www.mystatesman.com ~~
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Translate: FROM English | TO English
Suggesting that wind turbines can hinder military readiness, a Texas lawmaker has proposed barring wind farms near some military installations.
The Mission Preparedness Protection Act, filed by State Sen. Donna Campbell, R-New Braunfels, would stop the erection of wind turbines within 30 nautical miles of the boundaries of Texas military aviation facilities by prohibiting subsidies for such wind farms.
The proposal gets at a long-running struggle over renewable energy, about the extent to which the wind and solar industry deserve versions of subsidies won by other, more conventional industries.
In a statement, Campbell argued the military installations are too valuable to the state’s economy to be hindered by the wind farms.
“Our military installations provide a $135 billion boost to the economy and are responsible for employing over 800,000 Texans directly and indirectly,” Campbell said in a news release. “Losing military missions due to wind farms negatively affects the long-term viability of these bases, and we cannot allow that to happen.”
Citing testimony at a Senate committee meeting in the spring that laid out the danger wind farms pose to pilots taking off and landing, she called turbines the “leading threat to mission readiness” at Sheppard Air Force Base outside Wichita Falls and Naval Air Station Kingsville.
“I do feel like one day we’re going to wake up surrounded by wind farms in South Texas significantly impacting the mission in a negative way,” Capt. Christopher Misner, commanding officer of Naval Air Station Kingsville, told the Veteran Affairs and Military Installations Committee.
Campbell, who chairs the committee, said she’s filing the bill “to ensure our military installations remain mission capable.”
Jeff Clark, executive director of the Austin-based Wind Coalition, said there is “already a robust process” for vetting the siting of wind turbines near military installations.
He said that since Texas lawmakers hosted hearings on the matter this year, the U.S. Department of Defense has won greater power to stop the construction of the wind farms if the military thinks they are a problem. And he said the state grid operator now requires wind developers to notify the military of their siting proposals before the grid operator studies whether they can be connected to the grid.
Texas leads the country in wind generation; Clark said roughly a quarter of wind turbines in the state would not have been able to be constructed if Campbell’s law had been on the books.
“Rather than applying arbitrary distances, what matters is a technical assessment by the military if a project is compatible or incompatible” with base operations, Clark said.
This article is the work of the source indicated. Any opinions expressed in it are not necessarily those of National Wind Watch.
The copyright of this article resides with the author or publisher indicated. As part of its noncommercial educational effort to present the environmental, social, scientific, and economic issues of large-scale wind power development to a global audience seeking such information, National Wind Watch endeavors to observe “fair use” as provided for in section 107 of U.S. Copyright Law and similar “fair dealing” provisions of the copyright laws of other nations. Send requests to excerpt, general inquiries, and comments via e-mail.
| Wind Watch relies entirely on User Contributions |
 (via Stripe) |
 (via Paypal) |
Share:
[ Short URL: https://wind-watch.org/news/?p=80727 ]
